User talk:Makedonovlah: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Editing in contentious area: new section |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Megleno-Romanians == |
== Megleno-Romanians == |
||
You may want to take a look at this and give your input: [[User_talk:MacedonianBoy#Megleno-Romanians]]. But be cool, you saw the warning above ;-)--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 17:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC) |
You may want to take a look at this and give your input: [[User_talk:MacedonianBoy#Megleno-Romanians]]. But be cool, you saw the warning above ;-)--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 17:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Editing in contentious area == |
|||
{{uw-balkans}} It bears restating that this notice does not imply that you are doing '''anything''' wrong as yet; its just that you have been working in a part of Wikipedia where your editing is going to attract extra scrutiny. Please be sure that you remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] and your edits abide by the core Wikipedia principles of [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] and that, when challenged, you engage in [[WP:BRD|discussion]] rather than resorting to unproductive back-and-forth reverting, known on wikipedia as an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. Again, you are not being accused of anything, merely being notified of the special scrutiny placed on an area where you are working. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 18:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:52, 6 January 2011
Makedono-Vlachs
Do you have a source saying that today, in English, Aromanians are called Makedono-Vlachs? Not a book published in 1813 in other languages. — AdiJapan 07:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
I have fixed the image description for you. Please do not declare images like that as "your own work", because obviously it isn't. Please be so kind and also add the immediate source you got this from, i.e. the web page or the book you scanned it from. (The ultimate "source" is, of course, the 1797 book itself, and that's okay because it means it's in the public domain now.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Warning
In addition to the above, please also be aware that postings like this [2] to User talk:MacedonianBoy are quite unacceptable here on Wikipedia. This is not the place for cheap national polemics and personal attacks. We are all here to collaborate politely and constructively with each other, and if you are not willing to do this, this is not the place for you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Megleno-Romanians
You may want to take a look at this and give your input: User_talk:MacedonianBoy#Megleno-Romanians. But be cool, you saw the warning above ;-)--Codrin.B (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Editing in contentious area
{{subst:Contentious topics/alert|topic=b}} It bears restating that this notice does not imply that you are doing anything wrong as yet; its just that you have been working in a part of Wikipedia where your editing is going to attract extra scrutiny. Please be sure that you remain civil and your edits abide by the core Wikipedia principles of neutrality and verifiability and that, when challenged, you engage in discussion rather than resorting to unproductive back-and-forth reverting, known on wikipedia as an edit war. Again, you are not being accused of anything, merely being notified of the special scrutiny placed on an area where you are working. --Jayron32 18:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)