User talk:Active Banana: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 39 thread(s) (older than 24h) to /dev/null. |
m move comment out of archive template |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
||
|counter = 3 |
|counter = 3 |
||
Line 21: | Line 17: | ||
|archive = User talk:Active Banana/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:Active Banana/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== For future reference == |
== For future reference == |
Revision as of 14:22, 2 February 2011
Welcome!
Hello, Active Banana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Otaki Forks
By the sounds of it you have not been to otaki fors and the
For future reference
martin bormann
hullo why did you remove my martin bormann in popular culture ref
Sankurathri Foundation in need of monitoring and clean up
To do
Policy Regarding Unsourced Material
"If a claim is doubtful but not harmful, use the [citation needed] tag, which will add "citation needed," but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time." Please add the fact tag in the future, instead of simply undoing the changes that have been made.
You can choose to do otherwise, but the policy does suggest that you add fact tags for information that is not harmful. You're free to believe what you want, but it's hard for me to believe that being listed as an associated act is harmful to the article when the article already references that association.
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Malizia Clinic pics
Hi Banana. I orig. left this article for user:tnxman, thinking that he deleted the images. But actually, commonsdelinker, a bot I presume, deleted it. tnXman did not yet respond, so I'm posting this to your talk page. Thank you.
You deleted two jpg files: Malizia-clinic-CT-imaging-suite.jpg and Malizia-clinic-exterior.jpg
These files were not copyright violations. They are pics from my personal collection which were not used on the Malizia Clinic site. I am a friend of the marketing dir. at the clinic and those pics are mine. Please check again. The pics are part of that same set, but they are unpublished. If you look carefully at malizia.org, you will see that the ones I uploaded were not the same as the ones on the site. Thank you. 1weezie23 (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC
Reason put by u was wrong
This is in response to ur message osted on 8th october. i had no time to reply.
by the way i have no obsession with the "nickname" and moreover superstar is not a nickname but a title conferred out of respect and admiration for his varied performances given by critics.
its u who had unnecessarily edited and written he is called a superstar cause of he had maddest fan following among female fans.
the entertainment one india article is actually talking about why he still remains the biggest superstar-- for that that was cited as the reason.Read the lines from the artcile ---"Why since four long decades 'Kakaji's' superstar status is still not passed on? Because he had the biggest and the maddest fan following, especially his female fans."---http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/interviews/2009/rajesh-khanna-interview-100609.html.
but why superstar he is called for that the reason is he was called as superstar by critics for his performances beginning with aradhana and giving consecutive 15 hits, then giving critically acclaimed box office hits continuously and consistently if not consecutively!!these reasons needent be mentioned as they are covered at various places.it need not be repeated so stop raising this issue. the artcile didnt need that wrong reson as put by u. infact i had no problems with the artcile untill 8th october ....as article looks pretty good.
Warnings
December 2010
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:MissBarkley, Taylor Swift, Kanye West, and Beyonce Knowles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MissBarkley (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
February 1, 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing as you did at Lost Highway (film). If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Editor Ignasi (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Editor Ignasi (talk) 17:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
You have been referred to administration for blocking. --Editor Ignasi (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- And this administrator has reviewed your edits and determined them to be in good faith. Thank you also for opening talk page discussion on the issue. Carry on. —C.Fred (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Also, just to note here that in addition to the spurious warnings above, Editor Ignasi (talk · contribs) posted to AIV; the post was removed as there is no case of any 'vandalism' from AB. diff. Chzz ► 18:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
good day
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Smiley-Lollipop.png/120px-Smiley-Lollipop.png)
Russart 1999 has given you a LOLipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
how can i know if the sources that i put is not reliable?