User talk:Cat-five: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 21 March 2011: new section |
→Re Thanks: new section |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)</div> |
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0124 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0124 --> |
||
== Re Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for the comments. Yeah, some things I'm as much trying to at least provoke a bit of discussion or debate - just to try to get a bit of life there and at least get people thinking about 'the decline' (for example, though in many ways I'd like FPC to be for images exclusive to Wikipedia, I have in fact nominated several non-Wikipedian images myself, and supported dozens more over the years; I can live with it, but I still think the focus should be on 'our own' stuff). A shame most people are just happy to shrug their shoulders about it. |
|||
Perhaps the saddest thing was that most of the responses came from a few old-timers, most of who are now semi-regular at best, so I agree that it won't amount to much. As you say on FPC talk, it's a shame we've lost so many good contributors, often through petty back-biting and politicking. Another one that always stands out for me is the disgraceful and thankless way [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] was treated after tirelessly closing for nearly two years, which lead to him leaving. I may return there at some stage, but I doubt I'd be on as regular a basis as I used to be, and I'm not overly inspired to spend much time there at the moment. Nice to hear from you. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 15:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:20, 23 March 2011
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is Cat-five's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Re Thanks
Thanks for the comments. Yeah, some things I'm as much trying to at least provoke a bit of discussion or debate - just to try to get a bit of life there and at least get people thinking about 'the decline' (for example, though in many ways I'd like FPC to be for images exclusive to Wikipedia, I have in fact nominated several non-Wikipedian images myself, and supported dozens more over the years; I can live with it, but I still think the focus should be on 'our own' stuff). A shame most people are just happy to shrug their shoulders about it.
Perhaps the saddest thing was that most of the responses came from a few old-timers, most of who are now semi-regular at best, so I agree that it won't amount to much. As you say on FPC talk, it's a shame we've lost so many good contributors, often through petty back-biting and politicking. Another one that always stands out for me is the disgraceful and thankless way MER-C was treated after tirelessly closing for nearly two years, which lead to him leaving. I may return there at some stage, but I doubt I'd be on as regular a basis as I used to be, and I'm not overly inspired to spend much time there at the moment. Nice to hear from you. --jjron (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)