Jump to content

Combination: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
partial undo of last two edits, merging additional details they provided into previous text rather than replacing chunks and leaving an inconsistent section
Line 65: Line 65:
As a concrete example, one can compute the number of five-card hands possible from a standard fifty-two card deck as:
As a concrete example, one can compute the number of five-card hands possible from a standard fifty-two card deck as:


:<math> {52 \choose 5} = \frac{52^{\underline{5}}}{5!} = \frac{52\times51\times50\times49\times48}{5\times4\times3\times2\times1} = \frac{311,875,200}{120} =
2,598,960.</math>

Alternatively one may use the formula in terms of factorials and cancel the factors in the numerator against parts of the factors in the denominator, after which only multiplication of the remaining factors is required:
:<math> \begin{alignat}{2}{52 \choose 5} &= \frac{52!}{5!47!} \\
:<math> \begin{alignat}{2}{52 \choose 5} &= \frac{52!}{5!47!} \\
&= \frac{52\times51\times50\times49\times48\times\cancel{47!}}{5\times4\times3\times2\times\cancel{1}\times\cancel{47!}} \\
&= \frac{52\times51\times50\times49\times48\times\cancel{47!}}{5\times4\times3\times2\times\cancel{1}\times\cancel{47!}} \\
Line 71: Line 75:
&= {26\times17\times10\times49\times12} \\&= 2,598,960.\end{alignat}</math>
&= {26\times17\times10\times49\times12} \\&= 2,598,960.\end{alignat}</math>


An alternative computation is:
Another alternative computation, almost equivalent to the first, is based on writing


:<math> {n \choose k} = \frac { ( n - 0 ) }{ (k - 0) } \times \frac { ( n - 1 ) }{ (k - 1) } \times \frac { ( n - 2 ) }{ (k - 2) } \times \frac { ( n - 3 ) }{ (k - 3) } \times \cdots \times \frac { ( n - (k - 1) ) }{ (k - (k - 1)) },</math>
:<math> {n \choose k} = \frac { ( n - 0 ) }{ (k - 0) } \times \frac { ( n - 1 ) }{ (k - 1) } \times \frac { ( n - 2 ) }{ (k - 2) } \times \frac { ( n - 3 ) }{ (k - 3) } \times \cdots \times \frac { ( n - (k - 1) ) }{ (k - (k - 1)) },</math>
Line 78: Line 82:


:<math> {52 \choose 5} = \frac { 52 }{ 5 } \times \frac { 51 }{ 4 } \times \frac { 50 }{ 3 } \times \frac { 49 }{ 2 } \times \frac { 48 }{ 1 } = 2,598,960.</math>
:<math> {52 \choose 5} = \frac { 52 }{ 5 } \times \frac { 51 }{ 4 } \times \frac { 50 }{ 3 } \times \frac { 49 }{ 2 } \times \frac { 48 }{ 1 } = 2,598,960.</math>
which can be evaluated efficiently from right to left as {{math|48 ÷ 1 × 49 ÷ 2 × 50 ÷ 3 × 51 ÷ 4 × 52 ÷ 5}}, in which all divisions give an integer result (they respectively yield 48, 1176, 19,600, 249,900 and the final result 2,598,960) so that only integer arithmetic is required. The reason all divisions are exact is that the intermediate results they produce are themselves binomial coefficients.

Using the symmetric formula in terms of factorials without performing simplifications gives a rather extensive calculation:


:<math>
Using the symmetric formula in terms of factorials gives
\begin{align}
{52 \choose 5} &= \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} = \frac{52!}{5!(52-5)!} = \frac{52!}{5!47!} \\
&= \tfrac{80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000}{120\times258,623,241,511,168,180,642,964,355,153,611,979,969,197,632,389,120,000,000,000} \\
&= 2,598,960.
\end{align}</math>


== Number of combinations with repetition ==
== Number of combinations with repetition ==

Revision as of 13:03, 27 March 2011

In mathematics a combination is a way of selecting several things out of a larger group, where (unlike permutations) order does not matter. In smaller cases it is possible to count the number of combinations. For example given three fruit, an apple, orange and pear say, there are three combinations of two that can be drawn from this set: an apple and a pear; an apple and an orange; or a pear and an orange. More formally a k-combination of a set S is a subset of k distinct elements of S. If the set has n elements the number of k-combinations is equal to the binomial coefficient

which can be written using factorials as whenever , and which is zero when . The set of all k-combinations of a set S is sometimes denoted by

.

Combinations can consider the combination of n things taken k at a time without or with repetitions.[1] In the above example repetitions were not allowed. If however it was possible to have two of any one kind of fruit there would be 3 more combinations: one with two apples, one with two oranges, and one with two pears.

With large sets, it becomes necessary to use mathematics to find the number of combinations. For example, a poker hand can be described as a 5-combination (k = 5) of cards from a 52 card deck (n = 52). The 5 cards of the hand are all distinct, and the order of cards in the hand does not matter. There are 2,598,960 such combinations, and the chance of drawing any one hand at random is 1 / 2,598,960.

Number of k-combinations

The number of k-combinations from a given set S of n elements is often denoted in elementary combinatorics texts by C(nk), or by a variation such as , , or even (the latter form is standard in French and Polish texts). The same number however occurs in many other mathematical contexts, where it is denoted by ; notably it occurs as coefficient in the binomial formula, hence its name binomial coefficient. One can define for all natural numbers k at once by the relation

from which it is clear that and for k > n. To see that these coefficients count k-combinations from S, one can first consider a collection of n distinct variables Xs labeled by the elements s of S, and expand the product over all elements of S:

it has 2n distinct terms corresponding to all the subsets of S, each subset giving the product of the corresponding variables Xs. Now setting all of the Xs equal to the unlabeled variable X, so that the product becomes (1 + X)n, the term for each k-combination from S becomes Xk, so that that the coefficient of that power in the result equals the number of such k-combinations.

Binomial coefficients can be computed explicitly in various ways. To get all of them for the expansions up to (1 + X)n, one can use (in addition to the basic cases already given) the recursion relation

which follows from (1 + X)n = (1 + X)n − 1(1 + X); this leads to the construction of Pascal's triangle.

For determining an individual binomial coefficient, it is more practical to use the formula

In this formula the numerator gives the number of k-permutations of n, i.e., of sequences of k distinct elements of S, while the denominator gives the number of such k-permutations that give the same k-combination when the order is ignored.

When k exceeds n/2, the above formula contains factors common to the numerator and the denominator, and canceling them out gives the relation

This expresses a symmetry that is evident from the binomial formula, and can also be understood in terms of k-combinations by taking the complement of such a combination, which is an (nk)-combination.

Finally there is a formula which exhibits this symmetry directly, and has the merit of being easy to remember:

where n! denotes the factorial of n. It is obtained from the previous formula by multiplying denominator and numerator by (nk)!, so it is certainly inferior as a method of computation to that formula.

The last formula can be understood directly, by considering the n! permutations of all the elements of S. Each such permutation gives a k-combination by selecting its first k elements. There are many duplicate selections: any combined permutation of the first k elements among each other, and of the final (n − k) elements among each other produces the same combination; this explains the division in the formula.

From the above formulas follow relations between adjacent numbers in Pascal's triangle in all three directions:

,
,
.

Together with the basic cases , these allow successive computation of respectively all numbers of combinations from the same set (a row in Pascal's triangle), of k-combinations of sets of growing sizes, and of combinations with a complement of fixed size nk.

Example of counting combinations

As a concrete example, one can compute the number of five-card hands possible from a standard fifty-two card deck as:

Alternatively one may use the formula in terms of factorials and cancel the factors in the numerator against parts of the factors in the denominator, after which only multiplication of the remaining factors is required:

Another alternative computation, almost equivalent to the first, is based on writing

which gives

which can be evaluated efficiently from right to left as 48 ÷ 1 × 49 ÷ 2 × 50 ÷ 3 × 51 ÷ 4 × 52 ÷ 5, in which all divisions give an integer result (they respectively yield 48, 1176, 19,600, 249,900 and the final result 2,598,960) so that only integer arithmetic is required. The reason all divisions are exact is that the intermediate results they produce are themselves binomial coefficients.

Using the symmetric formula in terms of factorials without performing simplifications gives a rather extensive calculation:

Number of combinations with repetition

A k-combination with repetitions, or k-multicombination, or multiset of size k from a set S is given by a sequence of k not necessarily distinct elements of S, where order is not taken into account: two sequences of which one can be obtained from the other by permuting the terms define the same multiset. If S has n elements, the number of such k-multicombinations is also given by a binomial coefficient, namely by

(the case where both n and k are zero is special; the correct value 1 (for the empty 0-multicombination) is given by left hand side , but not by the right hand side ).

Example of counting multicombinations

For example, if you have ten types of donuts (n = 10) on a menu to choose from and you want three donuts (k = 3), the number of ways to choose can be calculated as

The analogy with the k-combination case can be stressed by writing the binomial coefficient using a rising factorial power

There is an easy way to understand the above result. Label the elements of S with numbers 0, 1, ..., n − 1, and choose a k-combination from the set of numbers { 1, 2, ..., n + k − 1 } (so that there are n − 1 unchosen numbers). Now change this k-combination into a k-multicombination of S by replacing every (chosen) number x in the k-combination by the element of S labeled by the number of unchosen numbers less than x. This is always a number in the range of the labels, and it is easy to see that every k-multicombination of S is obtained for one choice of a k-combination.

A concrete example may be helpful. Suppose there are 4 types of fruits (apple, orange, pear, banana) at a grocery store, and you want to buy 12 pieces of fruit. So n = 4 and k = 12. Use label 0 for apples, 1 for oranges, 2 for pears, and 3 for bananas. A selection of 12 fruits can be translated into a selection of 12 distinct numbers in the range 1,...,15 by selecting as many consecutive numbers starting from 1 as there are apples in the selection, then skip a number, continue choosing as many consecutive numbers as there are oranges selected, again skip a number, then again for pears, skip one again, and finally choose the remaining numbers (as many as there are bananas selected). For instance for 2 apples, 7 oranges, 0 pears and 3 bananas, the numbers chosen will be 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15. To recover the fruits, the numbers 1, 2 (not preceded by any unchosen numbers) are replaced by apples, the numbers 4, 5, ..., 10 (preceded by one unchosen number: 3) by oranges, and the numbers 13, 14, 15 (preceded by three unchosen numbers: 3, 11, and 12) by bananas; there are no chosen numbers preceded by exactly 2 unchosen numbers, and therefore no pears in the selection. The total number of possible selections is

Number of k-combinations for all k

The number of k-combinations for all k, , is the sum of the nth row (counting from 0) of the binomial coefficients. These combinations are enumerated by the 1 digits of the set of base 2 numbers counting from 0 to , where each digit position is an item from the set of n.

See also

References

  1. ^ Erwin Kreyszig, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, INC, 1999