Wikipedia:Peer review/Space debris/archive2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Archiving peer review (bot task 1) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
||
--> |
--> |
||
'''This peer review discussion has been closed.'''<br/> <noinclude>[[Category:July 2011 peer reviews]]</noinclude> |
|||
{{Peer review page|topic=natsci}} |
|||
I've listed this article for peer review because it failed a FAC and I'm trying to get more eyeballs on it. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it failed a FAC and I'm trying to get more eyeballs on it. |
||
Revision as of 10:00, 12 July 2011
Space debris
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it failed a FAC and I'm trying to get more eyeballs on it.
Thanks, Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Query, are the hints provided by the automated tool tested against the article? If so, is there a link from the hint back to the place in the article where it occurs? It's telling me there's some missing nbsp's in units, but it's tedious to find these manually. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)