Jump to content

User talk:Indubitably: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 180276242 by 64.147.0.70 (talk) Reverting IP vandal. ;)
Line 69: Line 69:
::You're obsessing over this ham. You really should check out [http://www.honeybaked.com/ Honey Baked Ham] when you're on the east coast. You'd probably lose yourself. '''[[User:LaraLove|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#BA55D3">Lara</span>]]'''[[User:LaraLove/My heart|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#00CED1">❤</span>]]'''[[User talk:LaraLove|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#FF1493">Love</span>]]''' 03:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
::You're obsessing over this ham. You really should check out [http://www.honeybaked.com/ Honey Baked Ham] when you're on the east coast. You'd probably lose yourself. '''[[User:LaraLove|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#BA55D3">Lara</span>]]'''[[User:LaraLove/My heart|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#00CED1">❤</span>]]'''[[User talk:LaraLove|<span style="font-family:Georgia;color:#FF1493">Love</span>]]''' 03:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
:::noob, we have them all over. [[Passive (song)|Wake up. Face me...]] [[Special:Contributions/64.147.0.70|64.147.0.70]] ([[User talk:64.147.0.70|talk]]) 14:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
:::noob, we have them all over. [[Passive (song)|Wake up. Face me...]] [[Special:Contributions/64.147.0.70|64.147.0.70]] ([[User talk:64.147.0.70|talk]]) 14:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
:::ps - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hilary_Duff&diff=prev&oldid=180275018 nice work, knitta!]. [[Special:Contributions/64.147.0.70|64.147.0.70]] ([[User talk:64.147.0.70|talk]]) 17:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


== [[Elvis]] ==
== [[Elvis]] ==

Revision as of 17:39, 26 December 2007

User:LaraLove/title

User:LaraLove/background


LaraLove (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

*READ THIS FIRST OR YOUR MESSAGE MAY BE IGNORED*
Probably not, but read it anyway.

  • If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. If I've left you a message, you can reply there or here. If you chose to reply here, I will respond here.
  • If you are pissed off at something I've done, assume good faith. Most likely, whatever I did was with the best of intentions. If you decide to pitch a fit on my talk page anyway, note that I endorse WP:DGAF.
  • If you're coming here to request I review your Good Article Nomination or your Featured Article Candidate I'm sorry, but I'm not doing these right now. Please don't ask because I'll feel bad about refusing.



This is me! :)

This is how shit gets done.


the_undertow talk 00:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMGz

so liek i was blocked and then this relly kewl admin (me) leik unblocked me and then i had irc chatz with kittahz, and tehn, comma, it was ok, and tehn i had 30% of dleteing myslef, but didnt and then i went to bed, but before that i realizd that i adore u. happy holidays from teh drunks (some irc room in which is not named but has lulz). i realize none of this makes teh sense, but if it did, i would not be who i am, and im teh_artichoke. hic. teh_undertoes. the_undertow talk 12:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the single best contribution I have made to not just this project, but to the world in general. Go artichoke! the_undertow talk 02:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knitta GA On Hold

Comments are left here. Cheers and Merry Christmas. miranda 22:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly note

Hello LaraLove, I just wanted to say that I'm glad I ultimately supported your RfA. I think you've made a fine administrator, and I'm sorry for initially doubting you. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. Best wishes. Acalamari 02:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) That's very thoughtful! Merry Christmas. LaraLove 02:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, and thank you. :) Acalamari 03:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conversely, I'm regretful that I opposed. Remember to keep it cool ;) Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're fired. :p LaraLove 04:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No wai. Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 04:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for Hilary Duff article

I know that u have stated on top of this page, not to request for reviewing GAC and FAC but are u still "Peer reviewing" articles? The thing is i nominated Hilary Duff article for GA and it has passed its GA nomination. I intend to push it for FA status but before that i want someone unfamiliar with the article to go through it (peer review) so that anything i might have missed is noted and improved at this stage. Also i found ur name on the peer review volunteers list...thats why i'm asking. I guess the article is broad in its coverage, well sourced and referenced, and well written. But still i'd like it to go through a peer review. Thanks...Gprince007 (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm still doing peer reviews. I'll look at it this week. LaraLove 16:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanx for your quick response....you can check out the concerns raised during its GA nomination on its talk page. Of all the concerns raised, only one couldnt be addressed. Maybe u could help. Also any suggestions on improving the article are welcome.Thanks again...Gprince007 (talk) 17:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Merry Christmas or Happy holidays (or Happy <insert holiday here>). Hope you are having a good one. Mine is great so far. Take care, and Happy New Year when it comes. Also, congrats on your promotion. If only I had known... But too busy to stay on wikipedia. Oh well, you passed, and I'm certain you will make a fine Admin. Take care! Orane (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Layout

I kind of copied the GAN layout of your past eval. nom. page. I hope you don't mind. Merry Christmas. miranda 21:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. LaraLove 21:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When are you going to check back on the article? LaraLove 21:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want me to check ASAP, before the deadline? Whichever the case, message me on my talk page. miranda 07:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created, eh? Hmm, that's funny and I was looking through the edits, and it looks like it was created by someone else. I'm not quite sure who this creator is, but I bet he would sell out his own grandmother for a free ham! You gremlin. the_undertow talk 02:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STFU. Where did I say I created it? Goes to check wording on user page. LaraLove 02:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it. <3 LaraLove 03:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Articles I created:
Dieu et les Dames, the_undertow talk 03:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, that's not even how I meant it. Haha. That section is for articles that I've greatly contributed to... it was poorly titled. Muh bad. *puppydog eyes* You know I wouldn't try to take credit for your awesome work, sweets! I just couldn't do it. I gave you credit on the DYK nom, ya know... that's right. Cause I think of this shit. Did you realize that "this" and "shit" are an anagram.. never thought about it. Good times. LaraLove 03:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knitta, please! Must. Have. Ham. L8r, _Love. 'Good Times' can also be 'Smite Doog.' the_undertow talk 03:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're obsessing over this ham. You really should check out Honey Baked Ham when you're on the east coast. You'd probably lose yourself. LaraLove 03:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
noob, we have them all over. Wake up. Face me... 64.147.0.70 (talk) 14:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern. This matter has been rehashed ad nauseam on the Talk page. There seems to be enough agreement to start fixing the mess. This was one of the most offensive paragraphs (I assume you're talking about the Elvis' Sex Life paragraph?) It seems to be agreed that it is now time to start cleaning up the mess. Why don't you join in and clean up some of the other stuff? We sure could use some help. We've been knuckling under to the person's obsessions for about a year now, and that's quite long enough, don't you think? Or do you have another plan that might work better? Hoserjoe (talk) 08:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's amusing. If you'd actually read the talk page, you'd see that I've created a WikiProject for Elvis and we're working on the article. Your changes have been discussed ad nauseum, in that you are correct, and I recall consensus was not in favor of said changes, and you stopped contributing some time after suspicions of sockpuppetry were raised. The article just came out of full protection because of a content dispute earlier this month. Don't force it to be locked again. LaraLove 16:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]