Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notational bias: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m "Notational bias" seems nonsense |
fix nomination |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Notational bias]]=== |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} |
|||
:{{la|Notational bias}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notational bias|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 December 16#{{anchorencode:Notational bias}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd=Wikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2F{{urlencode:Notational bias}} AfD statistics]) |
|||
:({{findsources|Notational bias}}) |
|||
[[Notational bias]] contains no sources. Most of the text consists of three examples. One of them is definitely ridiculous (the programming example), one explains the common fact that multiple choice questions aren't perfect (but that's not a bias), and one ("writing down music western style more or less directs one to writing Western music") that could be a "notational bias" but i don't think it really is a bias. Without any sources, this article should be deleted. [[User:Joepnl|Joepnl]] ([[User talk:Joepnl|talk]]) 02:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC) |
[[Notational bias]] contains no sources. Most of the text consists of three examples. One of them is definitely ridiculous (the programming example), one explains the common fact that multiple choice questions aren't perfect (but that's not a bias), and one ("writing down music western style more or less directs one to writing Western music") that could be a "notational bias" but i don't think it really is a bias. Without any sources, this article should be deleted. [[User:Joepnl|Joepnl]] ([[User talk:Joepnl|talk]]) 02:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:39, 16 December 2009
- Notational bias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notational bias contains no sources. Most of the text consists of three examples. One of them is definitely ridiculous (the programming example), one explains the common fact that multiple choice questions aren't perfect (but that's not a bias), and one ("writing down music western style more or less directs one to writing Western music") that could be a "notational bias" but i don't think it really is a bias. Without any sources, this article should be deleted. Joepnl (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)