Jump to content

User talk:Perl: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Perl (talk | contribs)
remove comment
Line 23: Line 23:


:::Sandy, I feel you are harassing me. If you want to take me up on my offer of retraction, that's fine. But I cannot involve myself in this anymore until something is done. [[User:Perl|Perl]] ([[User talk:Perl#top|talk]]) 20:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Sandy, I feel you are harassing me. If you want to take me up on my offer of retraction, that's fine. But I cannot involve myself in this anymore until something is done. [[User:Perl|Perl]] ([[User talk:Perl#top|talk]]) 20:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

== Time to stop ==

With comments like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=200136807] you are really walking very close to the edge. I strongly suggest that you drop your speculations regarding SandyGeorgia and disengage, otherwise you are likely to find yourself blocked from editing, especially given your history of tendentious editing to the article on a group against whom you have a self-admitted off-wiki agenda. It's really not acceptable behaviour and it needs to stop. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 20:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:07, 22 March 2008

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For many contributions with limited reward, I present you with this Original Barnstar. Our Admins need to be appreciated every now and then. Sharkface217 00:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Dispute resolution

As part of dispute resolution, I am formally requesting that you strike the false information you have posted at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wrong Planet on autism articles again. If you strike, I will consider the issue closed; if not, further steps in dispute resolution will need to be pursued. You should be aware that you can't just make false statements about someone on Wiki to attempt to discredit them. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, that would be a good start. Guy (Help!) 22:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Alex, while you have not yet responded to my post from yesterday, or stricken the untruthful statements from ANI (and I use that term politely), you have now added a second misstatement (again, I use that term politely) to the ANI.[1] You have continued a campaign of harassment and mistruths about me and have not engaged in discussion about these untruths. You can dig yourself out of this mess by simply discussing it here on your talk page, as appropriate; I suggest you do that. I specifically did not call for Wrong Planet to be deleted when it came up at AN/I AfD; your statement is again, flatly untrue. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because you responded at AN/I, I responded there. I don't like splitting discussions three ways; I am following your talk page and AN/I. Please feel free to continue dialogue here, once you strike the untruths at An/I. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am formally asking you, for the last time, to strike the untrue statements from AN/I. I am not a banned WrongPlanet member, and I have not attempted to have the Wrong Planet article AfD'd. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy, please don't make things up. I didn't say you posted the article to the AfD page or even contributed to the afd discussion. I specifically said "She was adamant in trying to get the article deleted and other wikipedia editors were opposed to doing so for obvious reasons." I said this because you have, in fact, made comments doubting the encyclopedia nature of the Wrong Planet article even though it meets all the requirements according to Wikipedia:Notability. I have been making multiple attempts to work things out with you but you do not even acknowledge how antagonistic you're being towards people on wikipedia. I've searched your name on Google and found other people who described you as a bully. By refusing to show any respect towards me as an editor, I am beginning to come to the same conclusion. I am still offering to strike any comments you don't like if you do the same. Despite the fact that moderators on wrong planet strongly believe you to be the same person we banned, I'm even willing to strike that comment. But you have to also at least acknowledge your role in this conflict. Perl (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidentally, these descriptions of me as a bully originate with your message board and with Zeraeph/mechanima. You've brought off-Wiki unfounded beliefs to Wiki; I strongly encourage you to show some good faith by striking the comments as soon as possible. I can assure you that showing some good faith towards correcting the untruths about me that have been furthered on your board, and now on Wiki as well, is the most expedient thing you can do at this stage. Whatever your moderators mistakenly believed is not my concern; here on wiki, your beliefs are irrelevant, until you use them to harass another editor, and then they do become relevant. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sandy, I feel you are harassing me. If you want to take me up on my offer of retraction, that's fine. But I cannot involve myself in this anymore until something is done. Perl (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]