Talk:Viserys Targaryen: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:11, 7 March 2021

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Novels: Fantasy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Fictional characters Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

A Song of Ice and Fire Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject A Song of Ice and Fire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of A Song of Ice and Fire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.A Song of Ice and FireWikipedia:WikiProject A Song of Ice and FireTemplate:WikiProject A Song of Ice and FireA Song of Ice and Fire articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Viserys Targaryen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160307150640/http://grrm.livejournal.com/164794.html to http://grrm.livejournal.com/164794.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restore original article

I recently discovered that before being a redirect, it used to be an article. The article showed to be available to be independent and have the enough information to keep being an article. First of all, I'm sorry for the recent undoing, and you need to know that I don’t want to begin an edit war, but please let me restore the page undo the redirect, because this character maybe has a recurring role but is an important character that obey all the rules to be independent. Can you give the article another chance?? Ulises1126 (talk) 1:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:09, 7 March 2021 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,549,964 edits m Signing comment by 187.162.49.51 - "New talk" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:11, 7 March 2021 edit undo Ulises1126 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 7,213 edits m Sorry I forgot to sign in. Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	==Restore original article==		==Restore original article==
	I recently discovered that before being a redirect, it used to be an article. The article showed to be available to be independent and have the enough information to keep being an article. First of all, I'm sorry for the recent undoing, and you need to know that I don’t want to begin an edit war, but please let me restore the page undo the redirect, because this character maybe has a recurring role but is an important character that obey all the rules to be independent. Can you give the article another chance?? [[User:Ulises1126\|Ulises1126]] ([[User talk:Ulises1126 \|talk]]) 1:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/187.162.49.51\|187.162.49.51]] ([[User talk:187.162.49.51#top\|talk]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		I recently discovered that before being a redirect, it used to be an article. The article showed to be available to be independent and have the enough information to keep being an article. First of all, I'm sorry for the recent undoing, and you need to know that I don’t want to begin an edit war, but please let me restore the page undo the redirect, because this character maybe has a recurring role but is an important character that obey all the rules to be independent. Can you give the article another chance?? [[User:Ulises1126\|Ulises1126]] ([[User talk:Ulises1126 \|talk]]) 1:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)