Talk:European Parliament: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:25, 1 April 2021

Template:Vital article

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

European Parliament is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 6, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
December 18, 2006	Good article reassessment	Delisted
June 16, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
July 16, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

European Union FA‑class Top‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics FA‑class Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a request, submitted by - J Logan ^t:, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important FA article, accessible information needed on such articles".

Template:WP1.0

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Straßburg Europäisches Parlament 06.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FA sweeps

Article needs work to maintain FA status, I'm afraid. Beyond unsourced statements, the article relies too much on official sources and news reports without much in the way of academic analysis. Balance also seems to be an issue. While it has a long paragraph on "European Parliament Mediator for International Parental Child Abduction" there is nothing to be heard about Euroskepticism,[1][2][3] or the many other issues discussed in academic sources[4] (t · c) buidhe 00:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 * [[commons:File:Straßburg Europäisches Parlament 06.jpg|Straßburg Europäisches Parlament 06.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-03-11T02:21:33.452008 | Straßburg Europäisches Parlament 06.jpg -->
 Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the European Parliament, Strasbourg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 02:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
+== [[WP:URFA/2020|FA sweeps]] ==
+Article needs work to maintain FA status, I'm afraid. Beyond unsourced statements, the article relies too much on official sources and news reports without much in the way of academic analysis. Balance also seems to be an issue. While it has a long paragraph on "European Parliament Mediator for International Parental Child Abduction" there is nothing to be heard about Euroskepticism,[https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F978-1-137-60201-5][https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501763.2020.1737881][https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07036337.2019.1599372] or the many other issues discussed in academic sources[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=European+Parliament&hl=en&as_sdt=0,48&as_ylo=2017] ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 00:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)