User talk:Fairness And Accuracy For All

Archives

---

1. Oct. 06 – Dec. 06

.

.

They huffed, and puffed, . . .

Thank you for offering your opinion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd). Look forward to seeing you around in 2007 at Conspiracy Central! For a little fun, check out Brad Greux's video blog at The Most Brilliant and Flawlessly Executed Plan, Ever, Ever. Good cheer from The Mad Dog, Morton devonshire 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

My response to Morty

File:Bushreadingthepetgoat.jpg

Ahoy there, unflagging Bush-junta supporter!

The spamalicious graphic notification you left on my (and 25+ other) talk page[s] was in violation of WP:SPAM, specifically "promotion of ...Web sites, fandoms, ideologies, or other memes." How would you like it if I left you a similar message promoting 911 Truth: Bush read about a pet goat while America burned? Wait... I just did! :-) Good cheer, returned - F.A.A.F.A. 23:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh, thanks for the nifty spam-box. I have added it to my Superfriends page. I sensed that you were the only one among the D's with a sense of humor. Apparently I was right. Thanks for demonstrating a sense of humor and not being a pedantic asshole. I mean that, sincerely. Your friend, Morton devonshire 23:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the box! I don't think I'd qualify as a 'Bush-junta supporter', but I think the box is a pretty cute reply. :) Umeboshi 03:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Note to those who may have come here to provoke and/or bait me

I may consider any and all contentious posts from certain individuals an unwelcome attempt to harass and/or bait me. Any such comments may be removed at my discretion in accordance with WP. "Users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments (on their own talk page) at their discretion." -F.A.A.F.A. 06:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

	CABAL-FREE ZONE
	This user space is guaranteed to be 100% Cabal Free, and 'sanitized for your protection'. "Certified Grade A, 100% Cabal Free" - U.S. DIvision of Cabal Inspectors - D.H.S. Fairness And Accuracy For All 01:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Inspected by number 23

Barnstar Award

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your work in dealing with sockpuppet, specifically User:ClemsonTiger, I award you this barnstar as a measure of thanks. Chris 00:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! You were a big help with the directory too. - Fairness And Accuracy For All 19:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

What's with the John Titor bit?

Who's he? --BenBurch 22:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Straight Up

Okay. Straight question, just want to know: Do you also edit under the username F.F.McGurk? Morton Devonshire^Yo 00:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Not me. I'd never bother with an article like Ronen Segev. What the f___? - Fairness And Accuracy For John Titor 01:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Just wondered, as F.F.McGurk was answering questions aimed at you at Talk:Project Megiddo, and that article is so sparsely edited. Can you think of who else it might be? Morton Devonshire^Yo 02:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I think they are seperate people Morton. To be fair, when I saw F.F's postings I thought, "oh look another Faafaa". Nonetheless, I don't think there's any relationship between the two. I thinks it more of a matter of birds flocking together like Ben and FAAFA (whom im certain are two seperate individuals). Folks who share a common ideology, tend to graviate to the same sorts of articles. Dman727 02:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Like the old CT board! Birds of a feather! Regarding FFMcGirk - I suspect its Jinx, deep-moling ;-) - Fairness And Accuracy For John Titor 02:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a bad guess, but with your denial, I know who it is now. Morton Devonshire^Yo 16:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

MONGO??? - Fairness And Accuracy For John Titor 19:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Our old friend [[Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Rootology]]. Morton Devonshire^Yo 17:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America

Added a ton of sources/links. F.F.McGurk 16:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Edits to my User Page

Thanks but I have it under control. I'm a big girl now and can look after myself. Mobile 01^Talk 09:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Rubber Dam

This was the content of the article on De.5, 5:00; last edit by Mobile_01; after that ther was ony orphanbot-edits and the tag for speedy deltion as copyvio, by you. At this point, because of the copyvio involved, it is not possible to undelete the history (at least to my understanding of the policy). I won't chime in on your sockpuppet controversy

Bridgestone Manufacture a Rubber Dam.

File:Deflate.gif

Bridgestone Rubber Dam - Deflated.

File:Inflate.gif

Bridgestone Rubber Dam - Inflated.

Since first deployed in 1978, the Bridgestone Rubber Dam has been installed in more than 20 countries. From icy rivers in Canada to tropical streams in Indonesia, raging mountain rivers in the western United States and the majestic Mississippi, the Bridgestone Rubber Dam has proved to be a cost-effective approach for solving problems in the irrigation, hydroelectric, recreation and water conservation industries.

The most important benefits of Bridgestone Rubber Dam are:

• Low cost compared to other controllable gates
• Low environmental impact
• Long service life
• Very low maintenance
• Simple construction and installation on new or existing foundation
• Excellent operational features in ice conditions
• Safe deflation under any conditions
• Ability to control water level

Regards. Lectonar 17:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Nice Patch

Like the idea. Unless, of course, you really have all of those sockpuppets you're always accused of having. On second thought, still an Army of One. Cheers. Morton Devonshire^Yo 19:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

-10DKP for failed attempt. --NuclearZer0 23:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Dude, what's with you? Morton Devonshire^Yo 01:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Unblocking of Dino

You said: "Are you aware that you helped unblock a user (Dino) who claimed that he called the author of a particularly contentious article, and then claimed that this author said that he never wrote said article here (when he did write the article - and it's even archived on his website!) - and based on this info a Wiki Foundation employee (who is not an especially active editor) User:Carolyn-WMF edited a contested article and removed critical material based on these false claims by Dino? proof here I look forward to a complete investigation of this matter, and find the utter unresponsiveness of this WMF employee and another Foundation member, Danny Wool, when questioned about this matter by two Admins and two editors more than a little troubling."

The discussions involved in this unblock are available in the unblock-en-l archives. This user was not blocked because of those edits, he was blocked for being a sockpuppet and the consensus of unblock-en-l came to the consensus that the user was not a sockpuppet and deserved to be unblocked. Anything more is outside of my expertise in this matter. I'm not saying that there are no other issues, only that they were not involved with this particular block or unblock as far as I am aware. --Yamla 21:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks - Do you not look at other, still-unsettled issues, including the VERY serious, highly likely charges that he tricked a Wiki Foundation Employee into editing on his behalf, based on LIES - issues that would mandate permanent blockage before unblocking such a user? - Fairness & Accuracy For All 21:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

No. The block was for being a sockpuppet and this is what we looked at during the unblock. Note that this was not a unilateral decision to unblock this user. There's nothing preventing the user from being reblocked, however, if these issues can be substantiated. Please see WP:DISPUTE and the various noticeboards at WP:AN if you wish to file a complaint about this user. Please note that I am recusing myself from any such investigation due to my involvement on unblock-en-l. --Yamla 21:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)