Talk:Melik Haykaz Palace: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Revolution Saga moved page Talk:Palace of Hamza Sultan to Talk:Melik Haykaz Palace: changed name according to discussion in Talk:Hüsülü, Lachin
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Artsakh|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Artsakh|class=stub|importance=low}}

== Sources, concerns ==

Before this gets out of hand, I'll ping editors who have been involved in this page [[User:Abrvagl|Abrvagl]], [[User:Kevo327|Kevo327]], [[User:A455bcd9|A455bcd9]], [[User:LouisAragon|LouisAragon]].

Abrvagl my question to you is, why did you revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melik_Haykaz_Palace&diff=1081945894&oldid=1081885736&diffmode=source] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melik_Haykaz_Palace&curid=54470160&diff=1081961732&oldid=1081955962&diffmode=source] Kevo327 when cited 2 sources aren't reliable? I just looked at your contributions and you didn't edit for almost a week. It seems like whenever Kevo edits (which also happened to be today), you follow him around, still. Did you forget recent ANI and the [[WP:HOUNDING|hounding]] you were advised against? This is just a testament that you aren't planning to stop it anytime soon. You had literally had 0 edits in this article prior to today, and bam, you're edit-warring now with Kevo (again) out of nowhere. [[User:A. C. Santacruz|A. C. Santacruz]] I'm sure you remember this since you advised Abrvagl against hounding. There is clearly a pattern here and Abrvagl doesn't seem show any change.
*{{tq|''Did not find RNS where source "deemed unusable". second source also OK for the referenced part.''}}

Also, Abrvagl, you're well aware of the RSN discussion since you asked about it literally below my thread in Morbidthoughts talk page and received an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Morbidthoughts&diff=1080511746&oldid=1080446535&diffmode=source answer]. I would definitely Support a one way IBAN or topic ban at this point. You're just being disruptive, edit-warring and restoring poorly sourced content, and still hounding said user. [[User:ZaniGiovanni|ZaniGiovanni]] ([[User talk:ZaniGiovanni|talk]]) 17:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:30, 10 April 2022

WikiProject iconAzerbaijan Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArtsakh Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconMelik Haykaz Palace is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources, concerns

Before this gets out of hand, I'll ping editors who have been involved in this page Abrvagl, Kevo327, A455bcd9, LouisAragon.

Abrvagl my question to you is, why did you revert [1] [2] Kevo327 when cited 2 sources aren't reliable? I just looked at your contributions and you didn't edit for almost a week. It seems like whenever Kevo edits (which also happened to be today), you follow him around, still. Did you forget recent ANI and the hounding you were advised against? This is just a testament that you aren't planning to stop it anytime soon. You had literally had 0 edits in this article prior to today, and bam, you're edit-warring now with Kevo (again) out of nowhere. A. C. Santacruz I'm sure you remember this since you advised Abrvagl against hounding. There is clearly a pattern here and Abrvagl doesn't seem show any change.

  • Did not find RNS where source "deemed unusable". second source also OK for the referenced part.

Also, Abrvagl, you're well aware of the RSN discussion since you asked about it literally below my thread in Morbidthoughts talk page and received an answer. I would definitely Support a one way IBAN or topic ban at this point. You're just being disruptive, edit-warring and restoring poorly sourced content, and still hounding said user. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]