Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fixed priorxfd template
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
*'''Delete''' - Although there is a little humor in it, it is mostly unfunny humor, and any good from the humor is outweighed by possible harm from increasing polarization and divisiveness. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 04:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Although there is a little humor in it, it is mostly unfunny humor, and any good from the humor is outweighed by possible harm from increasing polarization and divisiveness. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 04:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' insulting/inflammatory “humor” page that seemingly exists to [[Wikipedia:Cabals|promote the conspiracy theory that Wikipedia is controlled by leftists]] (either that or a [[Poe's law|wholly unfunny parody of it]]). [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|talk]]) 05:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' insulting/inflammatory “humor” page that seemingly exists to [[Wikipedia:Cabals|promote the conspiracy theory that Wikipedia is controlled by leftists]] (either that or a [[Poe's law|wholly unfunny parody of it]]). [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|talk]]) 05:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I don't remember making this article and don't really care if it gets deleted. [[User:CartoonDiablo|CartoonDiablo]] ([[User talk:CartoonDiablo|talk]]) 22:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:26, 22 June 2022

Wikipedia:Conservative Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
All prior XfDs for this page:

This essay was created ten years ago in retaliation to a content dispute the creator had. See the page's first revision; you'll see that it was created only several days after the dispute and it links to the same diff, ridiculing the other editor. I get that it's "not meant to be taken seriously," but Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges. Even if the link was removed, I don't see what purpose this page serves other than to (likely unintentionally) stereotype right-of-center editors as POV pushers who are unable to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 20:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]