User talk:Leflyman: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:06, 27 March 2007

Welcome to Leflyman's Talky Page

Please feel free to leave me a message

"Not a Fan site" proposal discussion (ongoing)
Archive 1: Oct 2004 - Sep 2005
Archive 2: Sep 2005 - Dec 2005
Archive 3: Jan 2006 - Feb 2006
Archive 4: Mar 2006 - Apr 2006
Archive 5: May 2006 - Jun 2006
Archive 6: Jul 2006 - Aug 2006
Archive 7: Sep 2006 - Oct 2006
Archive 8: Nov 2006 - Dec 2006
Archive 9: Jan 2006 - Feb 2006
Archive 10: TBD

My accusations of bad faith on Talk:New antisemitism

If I'm wrong about this (I mean the edits to the talk page that I believe clearly misrepresent what I said), then I really need to know about it. Both Jayjg and SlimVirgin refuse to discuss the issue. (My apologies if you're not interested in this.) —Ashley Y 21:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the attack on my user talk page. It's actually kind of funny that after my (not very happy) response to Jimbo's handling of the Essjay situation, I then get attacked by a troll for being a cultish follower of Jimbo! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Permission to use on Wikipedia is meaningless as far as we're concerned. If you can get the author to release the image under a free license then we can use the image. ed g2s • talk 22:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I.

I've brought the Krune Incident back to AN/I. Like you, I want to see this matter resolved to avoid further disruption and damage in the future. Understand that I am not reporting you; I simply want to resolve the Krune Incident. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Unresolved:_Dr._Stephen_J._Krune_III. Acalamari 23:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So...you're saying that there's little point in bringing a month's old issue back up. If that's the case, why even bring it up? As I said, I'm not bothered by the fact you opposed me; that's a non-issue. Acalamari 23:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks
*Leflyman, I want to apologize to you over the entire thing; and that includes everything that happened in the old discussion. Per this edit, I hope the incident was resolved. I really hope that, in the future, we can work together over something as opposed to keep talking about Krune and AN/I. Acalamari 00:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 I've brought the Krune Incident back to AN/I. Like you, I want to see this matter resolved to avoid further disruption and damage in the future. Understand that I am ''not'' reporting you; I simply want to resolve the Krune Incident. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Unresolved:_Dr._Stephen_J._Krune_III. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Unresolved:_Dr._Stephen_J._Krune_III.] [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 :So...you're saying that there's little point in bringing a month's old issue back up. If that's the case, why even bring it up? As I said, I'm not bothered by the fact you opposed me; that's a non-issue. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
+*[[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] *Leflyman, I want to apologize to you over the entire thing; and that includes everything that happened in the old discussion. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=118136261&oldid=118134565 this edit], I hope the incident was resolved. I really hope that, in the future, we can work together over something as opposed to keep talking about Krune and AN/I. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 00:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)