User talk:I'm tla: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:I'm tla/Archive 7) (bot |
→Gyat: Reply |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:* [https://lifehacker.com/what-is-sticking-out-your-gyat-for-the-rizzler-1850926437 Lifehacker]] |
:* [https://lifehacker.com/what-is-sticking-out-your-gyat-for-the-rizzler-1850926437 Lifehacker]] |
||
:and there's more online. In addition, the article attracts ~1.5K visitors a day, so there's a clear need for it in my opinion. If you want to nominate it for AfD, go ahead, I don't own the article. <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:darkgreen">[[User:I'm tla|<span style="color:white">'''TLA'''</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:I'm tla |<span style="color: grey">tlak</span>]]</sup> 20:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |
:and there's more online. In addition, the article attracts ~1.5K visitors a day, so there's a clear need for it in my opinion. If you want to nominate it for AfD, go ahead, I don't own the article. <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:darkgreen">[[User:I'm tla|<span style="color:white">'''TLA'''</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:I'm tla |<span style="color: grey">tlak</span>]]</sup> 20:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Pageviews or usefulness are not generally not a valid arguments (see [[WP:USEFUL]] and [[WP:POPULARPAGE]], an essay but often used in AfDs). However, if I were reviewing it at AfC I would have accepted it. If you have time, I suggest expanding it some using what experts say. The Today article has some expert commentary and the others might as well. See also my comments at AfD. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Gyat]] for deletion == |
== Nomination of [[:Gyat]] for deletion == |
||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
<div class="afd-notice"> |
||
Revision as of 17:37, 11 March 2024
| This is I'm tla's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
Deletion discussion about Saidullah Karimi
Hello I'm tla, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Saidullah Karimi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saidullah Karimi.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 20:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not think there has been enough secondary, in-depth coverage of this word for a standalone article to be viable. Would you mind if I redirected the article to List of Generation Z slang? Cheers, Mach61 01:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mach, I'd disagree, here's a few more that is full coverage of Gyat
- and there's more online. In addition, the article attracts ~1.5K visitors a day, so there's a clear need for it in my opinion. If you want to nominate it for AfD, go ahead, I don't own the article. TLAtlak 20:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pageviews or usefulness are not generally not a valid arguments (see WP:USEFUL and WP:POPULARPAGE, an essay but often used in AfDs). However, if I were reviewing it at AfC I would have accepted it. If you have time, I suggest expanding it some using what experts say. The Today article has some expert commentary and the others might as well. See also my comments at AfD. S0091 (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gyat for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mach61 04:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)