Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/April/6: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→April 6: Vote |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*** While {{tl|China-company-stub}} was mentioned there, it was my impression that it was not among those actually up for consideration. (It never did have an sfd template applied to it.) With China having companies before the PRC/ROC split came into being, I can't see getting rid of {{tl|China-company-stub}}, but I wouldn't object to adding {{tl|PRC-company-stub}}. <span style="font-family:cursive">[[User:Caerwine|Caerwine]]</span> [[User_talk:Caerwine|<small style="font-family:sans-serif;color:darkred">Caer’s whines</small>]] 00:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
*** While {{tl|China-company-stub}} was mentioned there, it was my impression that it was not among those actually up for consideration. (It never did have an sfd template applied to it.) With China having companies before the PRC/ROC split came into being, I can't see getting rid of {{tl|China-company-stub}}, but I wouldn't object to adding {{tl|PRC-company-stub}}. <span style="font-family:cursive">[[User:Caerwine|Caerwine]]</span> [[User_talk:Caerwine|<small style="font-family:sans-serif;color:darkred">Caer’s whines</small>]] 00:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
* Keep as umbrella category for the Mainland and Hong Kong ones. Passer-by [[User talk:Passer-by|(talk)]] 14:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
* Keep as umbrella category for the Mainland and Hong Kong ones. Passer-by [[User talk:Passer-by|(talk)]] 14:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''', and re-creation should go through proper procedures as per requirement at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting]]. While this may appear unnecesary and beuraucratic given the end result is likely to be the same, I feel it will set a negative precedent if we openly condone the behavior of renegades who disregard wikipolicies/guidelines and think they can overide them for no better reason than their self-perceived "truths". |
|||
Revision as of 16:25, 11 April 2007
April 6
Speedy Delete Empty, unproposed, category that is without a corresponding template. I don't see any need for this category unless we did have a {{PRC-company-stub}} template and that is regardless of whether or not Category:Mainland China company stubs survives its SFD discussion of April 3. Caerwine Caer’s whines 02:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Qualified delete. Realistically, I am unopposed if discussion meant that having PRC-company-stub was useful. Pragmatically though, my real answer is delete because then the mainland China POV pushers will use it to further their agenda that anything !=HK/MO/TW does equal "mainland" and thus this stub type would be empty, which is stupid. SchmuckyTheCat 00:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. No. Jinmen and Mazu never belongs to Taiwan, and in modern times not considered Mainland China. They are ROC's. Please make sure you know what you are talking about.
- Nobody requests to create Template: PRC-company-stub. Per earlier discussions on similar matter, Category: People's Republic of China something stubs are umbrella categories to hold the Mainland and Hong Kong ones where appropriate and necessary. (see my vote below for link) - Privacy 09:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per earlier decision on similar matter. (Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/December/4#"Mainland China" categories) This is an umbrella category to hold the Mainland and Hong Kong categories. - Privacy 09:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Privacy. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 19:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment ChoChoPK was prompted by Privacy to offer his brief comment. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Useful and necessary category with a neutral name. Michael G. Davis 20:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Michael G. Davis is a suspected lackey, symphathiser or even sockpuppet of User:Instantnood, of which Privacy is also suspected to be in similar relation with.--Huaiwei 12:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Would this be deleted in favor of using {{China-company-stub}} / Category:Chinese company stubs? ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I've finally closed the huge discussion from March 2, so this should probably be a keep. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- While {{China-company-stub}} was mentioned there, it was my impression that it was not among those actually up for consideration. (It never did have an sfd template applied to it.) With China having companies before the PRC/ROC split came into being, I can't see getting rid of {{China-company-stub}}, but I wouldn't object to adding {{PRC-company-stub}}. Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I've finally closed the huge discussion from March 2, so this should probably be a keep. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as umbrella category for the Mainland and Hong Kong ones. Passer-by (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, and re-creation should go through proper procedures as per requirement at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. While this may appear unnecesary and beuraucratic given the end result is likely to be the same, I feel it will set a negative precedent if we openly condone the behavior of renegades who disregard wikipolicies/guidelines and think they can overide them for no better reason than their self-perceived "truths".