Jump to content

The Argumentative Indian: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎External links: remove blog link
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
''The Argumentative Indian'' brings together a selection of writings from Sen that outline the need to understand contemporary India in the light of its long argumentative tradition. The understanding and use of this argumentative tradition are critically important, Sen argues, for the success of India's democracy, the defence of its secular politics, the removal of inequalities related to class, caste, gender and community, and the pursuit of sub-continental peace.
''The Argumentative Indian'' brings together a selection of writings from Sen that outline the need to understand contemporary India in the light of its long argumentative tradition. The understanding and use of this argumentative tradition are critically important, Sen argues, for the success of India's democracy, the defence of its secular politics, the removal of inequalities related to class, caste, gender and community, and the pursuit of sub-continental peace.


==Criticism==


The book stands exposed as an attempt to camouflage the roles of some of the more oppressive Muslim Emperors in India (such as [[Aurangzeb]]) in an attempt to whitewash the [[Persecution of Hindus]] in India.[http://www.thes.co.uk/search/story.aspx?story_id=2024955] [[Gordon Johnson]] , president of [[Wolfson College, Cambridge]], and general editor of "The New Cambridge History of India", criticizes Sen's history when he writes:

<blockquote>
Sen's history is weak. He chooses his examples to suit his present purpose without apparent awareness of their historical context...Although nicely written, and with many points of interest, there is a thinness [in the book] and superficiality about the whole that displeases..My greatest disappointment with this book is that its use of history is as unscrupulous and trivialising as that of those Sen wishes to bring down. The Argumentative Indian is not sufficiently thoughtful and serves as a forceful reminder that history is constantly being used in a dangerously naive way.
</blockquote>


==References==
==References==
Line 13: Line 19:
*[http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/books/story/0,10595,1524161,00.html In defence of reason], another review from ''The Guardian''.
*[http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/books/story/0,10595,1524161,00.html In defence of reason], another review from ''The Guardian''.
*[http://www.thes.co.uk/search/story.aspx?story_id=2024955 Effort to right wrongs leaves past shackled], a critical review from ''The Times Higher Education Supplement''.
*[http://www.thes.co.uk/search/story.aspx?story_id=2024955 Effort to right wrongs leaves past shackled], a critical review from ''The Times Higher Education Supplement''.



[[Category:History books|Argumentative Indian, The]]
[[Category:History books|Argumentative Indian, The]]

Revision as of 00:09, 13 April 2007

The Argumentative Indian (ISBN 0-7139-9687-0) is a book written by the Indian Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen. It is a collection of essays that discuss India's history and identity, focusing on the traditions of public debate and intellectual pluralism.

The Argumentative Indian brings together a selection of writings from Sen that outline the need to understand contemporary India in the light of its long argumentative tradition. The understanding and use of this argumentative tradition are critically important, Sen argues, for the success of India's democracy, the defence of its secular politics, the removal of inequalities related to class, caste, gender and community, and the pursuit of sub-continental peace.

Criticism

The book stands exposed as an attempt to camouflage the roles of some of the more oppressive Muslim Emperors in India (such as Aurangzeb) in an attempt to whitewash the Persecution of Hindus in India.[1] Gordon Johnson , president of Wolfson College, Cambridge, and general editor of "The New Cambridge History of India", criticizes Sen's history when he writes:

Sen's history is weak. He chooses his examples to suit his present purpose without apparent awareness of their historical context...Although nicely written, and with many points of interest, there is a thinness [in the book] and superficiality about the whole that displeases..My greatest disappointment with this book is that its use of history is as unscrupulous and trivialising as that of those Sen wishes to bring down. The Argumentative Indian is not sufficiently thoughtful and serves as a forceful reminder that history is constantly being used in a dangerously naive way.

References