User talk:H: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:47, 16 April 2007

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

User talk:HighInBC/Header

Adding sockblock to sockpuppeteer pages

I know what you are trying to do by this, simply stop them falling into the tempory category, but, why this template? As sockblock is for sockpuppets, not sockpuppeteers, and adding sockblock results them in looking like a sockpuppet. The whole idea is crazy. Retiono Virginian 18:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you manually removed a sockpuppeteer from the temporary userpage category. You can do so more easily by using {{Sockpuppeteer|blocked}} and removing the indefinite block template (see example). :) —{admin} Pathoschild 18:44:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate input

Ryan, as a username expert, would you care to offer an opinion on this? RJASE1 ^Talk 18:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi High

Is this what we're talking about? Niko Silver 09:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Please

There is a vandal on here who is trying to get me blocked, I don't know why, he is User:Glfootball92.

Southluver 12:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like everything was taken care of. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surprise

Now this was a pleasant surprise to discover on Wikipedia! Cheers, and keep up the good work. :-) --HappyCamper 14:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFCN

Hi there, I've responded to your block message for User:Spammyou on RFCN with a request that you unblock pending completion of the discussion, and I've outlined some reasons why I believe the block was a bit premature. The discussion may end with consensus to disallow the username, but it hasn't gotten there yet. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 14:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need a consensus at WP:RFCN to give a username block. If it is violation of the username policy then any admin can block at any time. The policy specifically mentions spam, and it gives me the impression of the intent to do so. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the RFCN discussion shows that there is not a consensus to block and I disagree that it violates, I'll unblock the user, but I want to consult with you first. I'll wait a little bit before doing it if you have any concerns. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I don't need a consensus to block. Unless there is a clear consensus to allow I don't see how any lack of consensus overrides my decision to block. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a consensus to allow, I did not block under any sort of consensus at RFCN, but through my own judgment. I suggest you bring this to ANI, because a lack of consensus at RFCN does not invalidate my block. I am going out for a couple hours. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 :I do not need a consensus at WP:RFCN to give a username block. If it is violation of the username policy then any admin can block at any time. The policy specifically mentions spam, and it gives me the impression of the intent to do so. <small>[[User:HighInBC|<sup>High</sup><sub>InBC</sub>]]<sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 16:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 ::As the RFCN discussion shows that there is not a consensus to block and I disagree that it violates, I'll unblock the user, but I want to consult with you first.  I'll wait a little bit before doing it if you have any concerns. - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 16:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
+:As I said, I don't need a consensus to block. Unless there is a clear consensus to allow I don't see how any lack of consensus overrides my decision to block. <small>[[User:HighInBC|<sup>High</sup><sub>InBC</sub>]]<sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 16:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
+:There is not a consensus to allow, I did not block under any sort of consensus at RFCN, but through my own judgment. I suggest you bring this to ANI, because a lack of consensus at RFCN does not invalidate my block. I am going out for a couple hours. <small>[[User:HighInBC|<sup>High</sup><sub>InBC</sub>]]<sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 16:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)