Strict: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 69.251.72.184 (talk) to last version by Tawkerbot2 |
More generally a {{ml|Partially_ordered_set|Strict_and_weak_partial_orders|strict partial order}} and strict weak order exclude equality and equivalence. |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In [[mathematics|mathematical]] writing, the adjective '''strict''' is used in to modify technical terms which have multiple meanings. It indicates that the exclusive meaning of the term is to be understood. (More formally, one could say that this is the meaning which implies the other meanings.) |
In [[mathematics|mathematical]] writing, the adjective '''strict''' is used in to modify technical terms which have multiple meanings. It indicates that the exclusive meaning of the term is to be understood. (More formally, one could say that this is the meaning which implies the other meanings.) |
||
This term is commonly used in the context of [[inequality|inequalities]] — the phrases "strictly less than" and "strictly greater than" mean "less than and not equal to" and "greater than and not equal to", respectively. A related use occurs when comparing numbers to zero — "strictly positive" and "strictly negative" mean "positive and not equal to zero" and "negative and not equal to zero", respectively. Also, in the context of functions, the adverb "strictly " is used to modify the terms "monotonic", "increasing", and "decreasing". |
This term is commonly used in the context of [[inequality|inequalities]] — the phrases "strictly less than" and "strictly greater than" mean "less than and not equal to" and "greater than and not equal to", respectively. More generally a {{ml|Partially_ordered_set|Strict_and_weak_partial_orders|strict partial order}} and [[Strict weak ordering|strict weak order]] exclude equality and equivalence. |
||
A related use occurs when comparing numbers to zero — "strictly positive" and "strictly negative" mean "positive and not equal to zero" and "negative and not equal to zero", respectively. Also, in the context of functions, the adverb "strictly " is used to modify the terms "monotonic", "increasing", and "decreasing". |
|||
On the other hand, sometimes one wants to specify the inclusive meanings of terms. In the context of comparisons, one can use the phrases "non-negative", "non-positive", "non-increasing", and "non-decreasing" to make it clear that the inclusive sense of the terms is intended. |
On the other hand, sometimes one wants to specify the inclusive meanings of terms. In the context of comparisons, one can use the phrases "non-negative", "non-positive", "non-increasing", and "non-decreasing" to make it clear that the inclusive sense of the terms is intended. |
||
Revision as of 13:45, 7 May 2007
In mathematical writing, the adjective strict is used in to modify technical terms which have multiple meanings. It indicates that the exclusive meaning of the term is to be understood. (More formally, one could say that this is the meaning which implies the other meanings.)
This term is commonly used in the context of inequalities — the phrases "strictly less than" and "strictly greater than" mean "less than and not equal to" and "greater than and not equal to", respectively. More generally a {{#invoke:Partially_ordered_set|Strict_and_weak_partial_orders|strict partial order}} and strict weak order exclude equality and equivalence.
A related use occurs when comparing numbers to zero — "strictly positive" and "strictly negative" mean "positive and not equal to zero" and "negative and not equal to zero", respectively. Also, in the context of functions, the adverb "strictly " is used to modify the terms "monotonic", "increasing", and "decreasing".
On the other hand, sometimes one wants to specify the inclusive meanings of terms. In the context of comparisons, one can use the phrases "non-negative", "non-positive", "non-increasing", and "non-decreasing" to make it clear that the inclusive sense of the terms is intended.
Using such terminology helps avoid possible ambiguity and confusion. For instance, upon reading the phrase "x is positive", it is not immediately clear whether x = 0 is possible, since some authors might use the term positive loosely, and mean that x is not less than zero. Therefore, it is prudent to write "x is strictly positive" for x>0 and "x is non-negative" for x≥0. (A precise term like non-negative is never used with the word negative in the wide, loose sense that includes zero.)
strict at PlanetMath.