Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lsi john: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
clerk: removing User:Lsi john and User:Smee's comments |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Please run a checkuser against me and all-other-wiki users and put an end to this nonsense. Please. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 08:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
Please run a checkuser against me and all-other-wiki users and put an end to this nonsense. Please. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 08:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
:{{delisted}} Unfortunately, your request is not compliant: checkuser is not a process to prove one's innocence. As a side note (sorry to bring an opinion here), it is my understanding that on wiki and everywhere, you're presumed innocent until sufficient elements prove that you are not. -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup>, ''[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks|checkuser clerk]]'', 09:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC). |
:{{delisted}} Unfortunately, your request is not compliant: checkuser is not a process to prove one's innocence. As a side note (sorry to bring an opinion here), it is my understanding that on wiki and everywhere, you're presumed innocent until sufficient elements prove that you are not. -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup>, ''[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks|checkuser clerk]]'', 09:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC). |
||
:{{clerknote}} removing [[User:Lsi john]] and [[User:Smee]]'s comments. Please either try [[WP:3O]] again, or any other step of the [[WP:DR|dispute resolution process]]. RFCU is really not the place for these. -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 15:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
That would be nice, but Smee is clearly assuming guilt. |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Lsi_john here]] |
|||
and |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lsi_admin here]] |
|||
and |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/COFS&diff=prev&oldid=129132065 here]] |
|||
other witch hunting not particularly directed at me: |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Smee#Arbcom_on_socks.2FIP_issue.3F here]] |
|||
and |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Smee#Suspicion_confirmed here]] |
|||
and |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anynobody#Confused... here]] |
|||
and your observed COI: |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Smee#Check_user_procedure here]] |
|||
Due to the serious allegations and innuendo being raised, I request the opportunity to clear my name and have those ''suggestive'' user and category pages deleted. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 11:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*For the record, I am not "assuming guilt". All of my actions in this matter are factual matters of record with regard to this user. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 12:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC). |
|||
And he shows up in virtually every conversation that I have with any user on wikipedia. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 12:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:And this page is on my watchlist. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 12:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC). |
|||
And even on the discussion page |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lsi_john&diff=prev&oldid=129470582 here]] he technically stays clear of making an outright accusation, but implies an impending event by using innuendo ''yet'', thus elluding to, but not actually claiming that I am a sock. [[User:Lsi john|Lsi john]] 12:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:12, 9 May 2007
Lsi john
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk Filed: 08:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
- Lsi john (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Justanother (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: Replace this text with the code letter from table at the top of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser that matches your request.
The Smee/Anynobody witch hunting insanity needs to end.
I don't know who all else he thinks I am. I listed Justanother because thats the only person who comes to mind.
Please run a checkuser against me and all-other-wiki users and put an end to this nonsense. Please. Lsi john 08:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Delisted Unfortunately, your request is not compliant: checkuser is not a process to prove one's innocence. As a side note (sorry to bring an opinion here), it is my understanding that on wiki and everywhere, you're presumed innocent until sufficient elements prove that you are not. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 09:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
Clerk note: removing User:Lsi john and User:Smee's comments. Please either try WP:3O again, or any other step of the dispute resolution process. RFCU is really not the place for these. -- lucasbfr talk 15:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
