User talk:Brunodam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:04, 19 June 2007

Ciao. I am beginning my first writing on Wikipedia. Bruno 10/26/2006

Your edit

I reverted your edit because it was full of unnatural phrasings and outright spelling and grammatical mistakes. As your English is not up to task, I suggest you edit the version of Wikipedia in your own native language. CRCulver 03:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of following some style guide or another, it's a matter of being able to write idiomatically. If you contribute to the English Wikipedia, someone will have to constantly chase after you to clear up your mistakes, and it would be better if you just concentrated on the Italian Wikipedia and let someone with better English skills translate your contributions over here. CRCulver 03:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Romanian

If your edit is removed because it violates WP:NOR, do not put it in the article again. And by the way "loanworded" isn't a word in English. CRCulver 07:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel words?

See the Wikipedia article on weasel words for an explanation of this colloquialism. By supplying this comment, I am not taking a position, one way or the other, as to whether your contributions are in fact "weasel words" or not. Richwales 21:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Romanian language

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule -- AdrianTM 21:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. This warning follows from this edit. CRCulver 21:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. This warning follows from this edit. CRCulver 22:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not blank a page just to hide template tag warnings. Incidentally, I've reported you for 3RR violation at the Administrators' Noticeboard. CRCulver 22:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I AM FORCED TO WITHDRAW FROM WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE OF A GANG AROUND CRCULVER. I AM DISGUSTED BY THIS KIND OF DICTATORSHIP. WHAT A SHAME! DR. BRUNO D'AMBROSIO

Gang around me? The other editors reverting your edit to the Romanian article and I don't even know each other. CRCulver 22:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In english you must write "any of them" , not "each other"! Learn to write well....By the way, all the members of this gang are Romanians, what a casuality, and you lived or live in Romania....

No, parse my sentence above correctly. I'll give you a hint, the subject is "The editors ... and I", so what object pronoun should that take? And as for those Romanians, the country has a population of something like 25 million. I've never met a Wikipedian on the street in Romania. Claiming some conspiracy theory may be interpreted as a personal attack, and you've already been warned for two. CRCulver 22:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR ARROGANCE IS UNBELIEVABLE. YOU ARE FINNISH (AND LIVED IN CLUJ), WHILE I LIVE IN FLORIDA WHERE NOBODY USES THE WORDS "EACH OTHER" IN SUCH A WAY....YOU BEHAVE LIKE THE TYPICAL COLLEGE (OR UNIVERSITY) STUDENT WHO IS NOTHING MORE. BY THE WAY, I HAVE INFORMED THE TOP MANAGERS OF WIKIPEDIA ABOUT YOUR GANG (OF ROMANIAN WIKIPEDIANS)AND YOUR BEHAVIOR! THIS IS MY LAST MESSAGE TO YOU, I HAVE -SERIOUSLY- TO WORK IN MY OWN LINGUISTIC RESEARCH COMPANY AND CANNOT LOSE TIME WITH PERSONS OF YOUR LEVEL.

I am not Finnish. I am an American (and therefore a native speaker of English) who now divides his time between Finland and Romania. As for informing the "managers" (for which one uses the term Administrators) you've already got two complaints about your edits on the 3RR and Personal Attacks noticeboards. No editor on Romanian language has come to your defence, shouldn't that tell you that there's a problem with your edits that you should correct? No one minds improvements to the article, but when improvements are not sourced from acceptable scholarship and are written in poor English, one has no choice but to revert. CRCulver 23:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I AM TALKING ABOUT REAL TOP MANAGERS OF WIKIPEDIA, NOT SIMPLE ADMINISTRATORS LIKE YOU AND YOUR GANG. LEARN YOUR ENGLISH, YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO DO YOUR FCAT!!!!!!!!

I'm not an administrator. If you e-mailed Jimbo or similar, such e-mails are generally ignored when one has not used the appropriate WP channels of complaint like the Administrator's Noticeboard. It's been several years now since one used off-site means to resolve disputes or raise a protest. CRCulver 23:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WELL, IT IS TIME........WIKIPEDIA MUST BE FREE FROM GANGS!...AND GO BACK TO PASS YOUR ENGLISH FCAT: YOU WRITE IN A COLLOQUIAL WAY, NOT IN REAL ENGLISH!

- You know the FCAT is a test specific to Florida, yes? That's what the F in the acronym stands for. CRCulver 00:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THEN DO THE ONE IN YOUR STATE......AND GOOD LUCK, GANG KID!

- I have completed a high school and, subsequently, a university education. Your comments continue to be personal attacks, and I'll have to add this one to the report at the Administrators' Noticeboard. CRCulver 00:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following is the punishment received by CrCulver: Blocled for one week in december 2006. Later, Crculver got even this: .."Blocked You are blocked for a violation of 3RR at Banat Bulgarians. You have had several such blocks before, and don't seem to be getting it. Mechanical edit warring without even an attempt at discussion, without ever having made a single edit to the article's talk page, is unacceptable. You must learn to deal with conflicts calmly and constructively, in line with WP:DR. Dmcdevit·t 18:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC) No, I don't think you seem to be getting it, Mr. Admin. This is actually getting quite ridiculous. Take a look at Citizendium sometime and see if you can connect the dots. CRCulver 18:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC) I would like to point out that I have faced such behaviour (mechanical edit warring without a single edit at the article's talk page) from user Crculver my self. I hope he will be sufficiently chastened this time not to engage in such antisocial behaviour in the future. If he doesn't it is at least good to know that he has been exposed as an antisocial element by other users as well. Xenovatis 19:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC) For immediately resuming edit warring upon your last block's expiration, especially at Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies), and for uncivilly referring your reversions as reversions of vandalis, which they weren't, you have been reblocked. Please pursue DR, not aggressive warring. Dmcdevit·t 06:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)......"

Finally I want to pinpoint that CrCulvert "has been exposed as an antisocial element by other users as well", as Xenovatis wrote above. Brunodam

Recent edits

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Please note that our community greatly values civility and calm debate to reach consensus about how best to proceed, in most situations. I encourage you to enter discussion and debate, but I also ask that you do so as calmly and reasonably as possible. Feel free to ask any questions you have at my talk page or the help desk, or place the text {{helpme}} on this page, with a question, and someone will be by shortly. Thanks for your time! Luna Santin 08:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pannonian Romance language, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 00:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Keszthely culture

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Brunodam! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 01:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits on Montenegrin articles

I really don't know where to start on this. First, Venetian albania-montenegro article you created is mostly untrue - you present it as a state of some sort, while it was only a small Venetian "colony"(it's not the best term, but it was something like an overseas territory), mostly located in and around the Bay of Kotor(I live there so I know the issue pretty well). I don't see the point of the mention of Albania there, since really it had nothing to do with the issue. Also, while Venezia held the Bay, Montenegro was a country bordering it from the northeast(From Mount Lovcen), so your name for the area is dubitable. Also, names of the languages and countries start with capital letters, so it's Montenegrin, Venetian, etc. I would also appreciate you discussing your changes on appropriate talk pages, since your contributions are somewhat controversial, although I see them as good faith edits. Cheers. Sideshow Bob 04:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start at the talk page of the corresponding article. --PaxEquilibrium 13:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you show at least a drop of good faith and leave the tags in the article? --PaxEquilibrium 19:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've just violated WP:3RR, even though we've warned you. --PaxEquilibrium 19:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because we didn't violate it. --PaxEquilibrium 21:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule on Venetian Albania for a period of twenty-four hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 20:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]