Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights Templar and popular culture: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Golfcam (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' as a violation of [[WP:NOT#INFO]] and unsourced listcruft. <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">críticame</span>]])</small> 15:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as a violation of [[WP:NOT#INFO]] and unsourced listcruft. <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">críticame</span>]])</small> 15:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[WP:ATRIV]] was made for a reason. Delete this along with all the other trivia articles in [[:Category:In popular culture]] (as of typing, there are 120 other articles on Wikipedia like this). [[User:Spellcast|Spellcast]] 16:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[WP:ATRIV]] was made for a reason. Delete this along with all the other trivia articles in [[:Category:In popular culture]] (as of typing, there are 120 other articles on Wikipedia like this). [[User:Spellcast|Spellcast]] 16:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. Not an article. All "in popular culture" lists should die. [[User:Golfcam|Golfcam]] 16:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:36, 24 July 2007

Knights Templar and popular culture

Knights Templar and popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - another laundry list trivia dump of a loosely associated items which have nothing in common beyond the presence of or mention of or reference to the KT. This does not inform us about the Knights, the fiction from which the references are drawn, their relationship to each other or the real world. Oppose merging any of this to any other article as it is just as undesirable there as in this article. Otto4711 15:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or merge and improve with references, pictures, etc. all of these "in popular culture articles" per User:Fresheneesz/Don't Destroy. I am concerned that a campaign to destroy these lists by a handful of Wikipedians is going to alienate who knows how many editors who contributed to making these fine additions to our project. I will see what I can do with some of these to improve them as well. I also suggest a more general discussion on whether or not these are encyclopedic at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Popular_culture instead of all these nominations. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, lacks any of the meaningful real-world analysis that Wikipedia requires. --Eyrian 15:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a violation of WP:NOT#INFO and unsourced listcruft. María (críticame) 15:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:ATRIV was made for a reason. Delete this along with all the other trivia articles in Category:In popular culture (as of typing, there are 120 other articles on Wikipedia like this). Spellcast 16:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not an article. All "in popular culture" lists should die. Golfcam 16:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]