User talk:Eidah: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:27, 10 August 2007

Handshake

Hmm, a Dutch Anti-Zionist with a thing for Dushinsky, the Eidah, and Givat Shaul... At the very least, I have to give you credit for sticking to your guns. This time, lets work together. You have a lot to say. Maybe I can help refine the message, and make it acceptable for Wikipedia. Despite your protestations, I am not a Zionist. And my edits to some of your friend Daniel's posts were kinder and gentler than others would have allowed had they gotten there first. --Meshulam 04:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amen to that, brothers. Now keep in mind all those halochos of bein odom lechaveiro. -- Y not? 16:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I believe you just violated WP:3RR on Neturei Karta. Please self-revert. Thank you. -- Avi 15:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Eidah_reported_by_User:Avraham_.28Result:.29 -- Avi 15:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Neturei Karta. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell ^Talk 18:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extremist

The word extremist is a problem because its POV. It is possible to say that one side views the other side as extremist. But it is not ok to quote the leading figure in one side of the conflict as proof that the other side is extremist. Yes, your edits comply with WP:OR. But they do not comply with WP:POV. I suggest that it be changed to something suggesting that one side considers the other side "extremist." Then show how. Then, maybe, provide (sourced) examples.--Meshulam 11:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other thing to remember is that if you're perceived as being a pain, you'll never win an edit war. And a 24 hr block means that everyone gets free reign on the articles in question until you're done. And then if you go back to edit warring, they'll just block you again. If you can reach a consensus (I'll help you on this one), then things will be more permanant.--Meshulam 01:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:45, 9 August 2007 edit Meshulam (talk \| contribs) 995 edits Extremist ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:27, 10 August 2007 edit undo Meshulam (talk \| contribs) 995 edits →‎Extremist Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The word extremist is a problem because its POV. It is possible to say that one side views the other side as extremist. But it is not ok to quote the leading figure in one side of the conflict as proof that the other side is extremist. Yes, your edits comply with WP:OR. But they do not comply with WP:POV. I suggest that it be changed to something suggesting that one side considers the other side "extremist." Then show how. Then, maybe, provide (sourced) examples.--[[User:Meshulam\|Meshulam]] 11:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)		The word extremist is a problem because its POV. It is possible to say that one side views the other side as extremist. But it is not ok to quote the leading figure in one side of the conflict as proof that the other side is extremist. Yes, your edits comply with WP:OR. But they do not comply with WP:POV. I suggest that it be changed to something suggesting that one side considers the other side "extremist." Then show how. Then, maybe, provide (sourced) examples.--[[User:Meshulam\|Meshulam]] 11:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
			:The other thing to remember is that if you're perceived as being a pain, you'll never win an edit war. And a 24 hr block means that everyone gets free reign on the articles in question until you're done. And then if you go back to edit warring, they'll just block you again. If you can reach a consensus (I'll help you on this one), then things will be more permanant.--[[User:Meshulam\|Meshulam]] 01:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)