Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 7: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
IronGargoyle (talk | contribs) →September 7: relisting |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
==== [[Template:Notpropaganda]] ==== |
|||
:{{lt|Notpropaganda}} |
|||
Inflammatory and [[WP:POINT]]y template created by a notoriously disruptive user with a past history of similar craft: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Template:Big_Sock_Fishing] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Wikipedia:Big_Sock_Fishing] --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 03:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Paradox games]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Paradox games]] ==== |
||
:{{lt|Paradox games}} |
:{{lt|Paradox games}} |
||
Revision as of 03:17, 7 September 2007
September 7
Inflammatory and WP:POINTy template created by a notoriously disruptive user with a past history of similar craft: [1] [2] --Irpen 03:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
This template is unused, it has been replaced by newer templates. — MrStalker talk 12:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. - Koweja 12:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not exactly convinced that the newer templates are better. For example, Template:Victoria series: templates like that are frequently deleted at TFD. GracenotesT § 02:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, replace the new templates with the old one and then nominate the new ones for deletion. Gracenotes is right, there are really too few links for the new versions to be useful navboxes. IronGargoyle 04:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Then there shouldn't have navboxes at all. Why keep a group of unrelated articles in a navbox? Just because they are from the same developer? What would it look like if you put all games from Electronic Arts or Ubisoft in one navbox? The navboxes exists to guide readers between related articles. If they want a list of titles made by one developer they should just look at the article about that developer or in a category. --MrStalker talk 12:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 02:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Template that was originally proposed at requests for rollback, a rejected proposal. Unused, probably never will be, and should be deleted. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 12:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unusable since the policy was rejected. - Koweja 12:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with requests for rollback, aside from mention of the rollback tool. That said, I as the creator have no opinion on its deletion. —{admin} Pathoschild 00:35:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect {{Rollback}} to {{uw-vandalism2}}; move {{Rollback2}} to Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Template:Rollback2 (no reason not to preserve it). GracenotesT § 02:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IronGargoyle 02:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)