Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
AnteaterZot (talk | contribs) Comment |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Per above. [[User:Tazmaniacs|Tazmaniacs]] 02:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Per above. [[User:Tazmaniacs|Tazmaniacs]] 02:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*Either '''keep''', but add references to really notable ones, i.e. those that make ''Countdown with Keith Olbermann'' or ''Attack of the Show'', or make a category for ones notable enough to have their own articles. The sources are notable, at least: [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/technology/26ecom.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5124&en=9670fbf567afd78d&ex=1330232400 New York Times], [http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2006/06/youtube_brooker.html Entertainment Weekly], [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115768704950557377.html?mod=googlewsj Wall Street Jorunal], etc. show that the topic has received mainstream attention. Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 02:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
*Either '''keep''', but add references to really notable ones, i.e. those that make ''Countdown with Keith Olbermann'' or ''Attack of the Show'', or make a category for ones notable enough to have their own articles. The sources are notable, at least: [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/technology/26ecom.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5124&en=9670fbf567afd78d&ex=1330232400 New York Times], [http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2006/06/youtube_brooker.html Entertainment Weekly], [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115768704950557377.html?mod=googlewsj Wall Street Jorunal], etc. show that the topic has received mainstream attention. Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 02:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
::"The really notable ones" have articles already. [[User:SolidPlaid|SolidPlaid]] 02:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:27, 14 September 2007
Nominated for the fact listcruft says it all. Dr Tobias Funke 00:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It doesn't seem to serve any purpose a category couldn't; it's not divided into occupations or anything like that as other lists of this type are.--Gloriamarie 01:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Such a list will become jam-packed with wannabees. At least if they have to create an article for a YouTube "celebrity", it must pass muster. As a category, it should be called "Internet video celebrities" or some such so that it is not restricted to YouTube. SolidPlaid 02:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. Tazmaniacs 02:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Either keep, but add references to really notable ones, i.e. those that make Countdown with Keith Olbermann or Attack of the Show, or make a category for ones notable enough to have their own articles. The sources are notable, at least: New York Times, Entertainment Weekly, Wall Street Jorunal, etc. show that the topic has received mainstream attention. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 02:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- "The really notable ones" have articles already. SolidPlaid 02:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)