User talk:66.35.127.0: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:15, 14 September 2007

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 06:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sorry

Not your fault, no need to apologize. I do appericate you letting me know. I am not sure how I will let things be heard from now on but we will cross that bridge when we get there. Again, no worries. Take Care....NeutralHomer ^T:C 08:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JzG

Calton is an "experienced administrator".

JzG misspoke: I am a very experienced editor, but the fundamental truth of what I said remains.

Speaking of fundamental truths, I'm certainly curious about the truth behind an IP with no contributions whatsoever except to suddenly pop up in defense of a troublesome user. Mind enlightening me about your sudden and narrow interest? --Calton | Talk 11:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're so concerned about why I'm defending a good editor like NeutralHomer against a troublesome editor such as yourself, look there.

Try again. I'm talking about your sudden and convenient appearance and narrow interest. --Calton | Talk 23:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first time I had any contact with him was when I left him a message telling him about your unwarranted attempt to discredit him on another users talk page.

Yep, your very first edit.

I'm sure that you can check on that and discover for yourself that I am telling the truth.

Yep, kinda the point -- which I've stated twice already -- which makes me wonder what it is you think you're arguing about. Your entire edit history revolves entirely around him and involving yourself in this affair. Funny, that. --Calton | Talk 23:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer edit because of you

Ah, so which group did you fall under? Unable to spam your product? Unable to proselytize your religion? Unable to load Wikipedia with trivia? Unable to control your temper? And what magic power did I exercise that stopped you from editing? My guess is, "citing policy".

No, don't bother responding. If you're a previously registered editor but lack the integrity -- or courage -- to speak up under your own name and let people judge your tale with actual evidence, you're not worth bothering with. And my guess is, it's because you're banned, and you don't want people to know that. --Calton | Talk 00:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know, enough of your trolling. At this point, your persistence, your obsession, and your lack of basic honesty -- intellectual or otherwise -- makes you not worth the trouble to respond to. As for your various claims about yourself, all I'll say is that if I somehow stopped you from editing -- 3:2 it's an explicit ban, and a toss-up whether it was spamming or fanaticism that doomed you -- then I say good riddance to bad rubbish. I say that you're a liar about your past, and coward for not revealing it. But any time you want to actually contribute to Wikipedia instead of whinging, have at it. --Calton | Talk 08:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:13, 6 September 2007 edit Calton (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 78,494 edits →‎User talk:JzG ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:15, 14 September 2007 edit undo Calton (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 78,494 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	No, don't bother responding. If you're a previously registered editor but lack the integrity -- or courage -- to speak up under your own name and let people judge your tale with actual evidence, you're not worth bothering with. And my guess is, it's because you're banned, and you don't want people to know that. --[[User:Calton\|Calton]] \| [[User talk:Calton\|Talk]] 00:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)		No, don't bother responding. If you're a previously registered editor but lack the integrity -- or courage -- to speak up under your own name and let people judge your tale with actual evidence, you're not worth bothering with. And my guess is, it's because you're banned, and you don't want people to know that. --[[User:Calton\|Calton]] \| [[User talk:Calton\|Talk]] 00:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

			You know, enough of your trolling. At this point, your persistence, your obsession, and your lack of basic honesty -- intellectual or otherwise -- makes you not worth the trouble to respond to. As for your various claims about yourself, all I'll say is that if I somehow stopped you from editing -- 3:2 it's an explicit ban, and a toss-up whether it was spamming or fanaticism that doomed you -- then I say good riddance to bad rubbish. I say that you're a liar about your past, and coward for not revealing it. But any time you want to actually contribute to Wikipedia instead of whinging, have at it. --[[User:Calton\|Calton]] \| [[User talk:Calton\|Talk]] 08:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)