Talk:Air route authority between the United States and China: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 29 September 2007

Aviation B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I can do it myself but help is always appreciated!

This isn't just a list. After the 1st version is finished, it should have a history section, discussion the nature of route authority between the 2 countries, which is much different from that between the US and many European countries. The current under-construction version looks like an award is given every year. It's not! There are only 10 daily passenger flights todayArchtrain 19:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With some articles, one can simply summarize the biography from the person's or government's or company's website. This article requires lots of time consuming research if the article eventually can educate the reader about the process and politics of bilaterals. There is no one article on the internet that has all the information. Of course, when finished, hopefully it will be a useful resources for at least a few readers worldwide. Archtrain 18:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: still working on this article with many sources each having a little bit of information. I may take a few days off. If so, note that work will continue!Archtrain 18:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, its not going to be speedy deleted - people can see its still being written, so need to worry :) Reedy Boy 18:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Things to do

Anyone may edit, make suggestion, discuss. However, I need to finish up the remaining outline (skeleton is in the article). Then I plan to research the Chinese side, particularly when they awarded rights to which airline. Afterwards, there is the cargo part of the story. Route authority is more relaxed (still restricted) here because cargo is less in the forefront than passenger services. It's possible that the cargo part of the article will come much later in 2007 or 2008 because I would like to move on to other articles before coming back. Archtrain 15:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new template

Template inserted as a "picture is worth a thousand words" Archtrain 18:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:09, 26 August 2007 edit Archtransit (talk \| contribs) 4,173 edits →‎Proposed new template ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:30, 29 September 2007 edit undo Trevor MacInnis (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 74,489 edits m assess for Aviation project Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WPAVIATION\|class=}}		{{WPAVIATION\|class=B}}

	I can do it myself but help is always appreciated!		I can do it myself but help is always appreciated!