User talk:M3tal H3ad: Difference between revisions

FACs needing feedback ; view • edit
Weise's law	Review it now

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:49, 15 November 2007

edit count | edit summary usage

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than (7) days are automatically archived to User talk:M3tal H3ad/Archive4. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives

/Archive1

/Archive2

/Archive3

/Archive4

Re: BFMV

You have to scroll down due to me being targeted by the Gestapo. BFMV feedback I'll post at the review oage as I find it, and good luck in future GAs / FAs - you reckon there's a GA lurking in Machine Head's tribute song to Dimebag? Could be. LuciferMorgan 12:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not too sure as concerns the names of Lombardo's children and the year he was married - do you really need it? An article needs to be comprehensive, and the article is as best as it can be. I don't think any details are really missing from the "Slayer" section of Lombardo - all I would suggest is doing that "Main article :Slayer" thing above the section. To your question... do I know of any interviews of where a metal band's entire history is documented in the one article? Only thing that immediately brings to mind is an email interview I did with a French band called Lyzanxia (supported Soilwork, and sound a bit like modern In Flames), which can be found here. LuciferMorgan 08:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lyzanxia link now works - I made typo mistakes. LuciferMorgan 10:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Godsmack Peer Review

I put a request for Godsmack to be peer reviewed, and you told me some things I could work on. First of all I would like to know what a Lead is, you had mentioned it, but I don't know what it is. And second, I will be working on Godsmack on a sandbox page (User:Skeeker/Sandbox/Godsmack), so would you mind checking it out every so often and coach me?

Thank you very much,

Skeeker _[Talk] 02:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am working in my sandbox right now. Skeeker _[Talk] 02:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing on your list I have not done yet is expand the album articles. I seem to be the only major contributor to the article, so any help I can get is nice, so thanks for helping out. As a side note, I've noticed that you claim you are going to work on Hellyeah sometime. Could you tell me when you do that, as I want to get that article looking better also, I make articles for singles and such when they are released.

Once again thanks, Skeeker _[Talk] 04:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who they got their name is stated in the influences section. If I put that earlier in the article should I remove it from later? And if I placed it earlier in the article wouldn't that kind of screw up the timeline? Skeeker _[Talk] 04:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have the name issue taken care of now. With the influences section, should that be renamed or removed? I personally have never liked it being there. Anything that needs to be taken care of please let me know on my talk page or by e-mailing me at sleep_walking_elite@hotmail.com. Thanks, Skeeker _[Talk] 04:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean by "Just try and get two paragraphs of information for each section." Skeeker _[Talk] 04:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have pictures of Godsmack that I took in Oshkosh, Wisconsin on July 21, 2007. If I get them uploaded or developed or something, can I use it as an infobox picture? Skeeker _[Talk] 06:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great if you could do that. I don't know what they are like, it was a cheap camera and I don't know when I can get a hold of them. I have the camera right next to me but my computor isn't reading it. Skeeker _[Talk] 07:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had a second wave review fron User:J Milburn, he said that I had to many one sentance paragraphs. Could you help me out be telling me what else to put into those paragraphs. And could you show me a proper source? Thanks, Skeeker _[Talk] 01:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed all of the references. How close would you say this article is to GA or FA status? Could you find an image on Flickr? Thanks, Skeeker _[Talk] 04:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there's not a whole lot of stuff to take care of is there? Skeeker _[Talk] 04:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anette image

Hey there, you still around? I noticed you uploaded an image of Anette Olzon at Wikimedia Commons. Could you please upload the highest resolution instead? And with a better name (like Anette Olzon, Halloween 2007.jpg)? I would do that, but since it was you the one who uploaded it, I don't want to step over you (especially since the smaller image will have to be deleted). Thanks for catching the image too! -- ReyBrujo 03:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, thanks for the image too. Now, there is a slight problem: you uploaded a modified version of the image, therefore the bot that checks whether the image is correctly licensed won't be able to do so. I suggest uploading the original (exact) image from Flickr, and then link the PNG version to the other as a "cropped" version. That way the bot can verify the original image faster. -- ReyBrujo 03:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 03:38, 15 November 2007 edit ReyBrujo (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 40,722 edits →‎Anette image: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:49, 15 November 2007 edit undo ReyBrujo (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 40,722 edits →‎Anette image: -> Reply Next edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Hey there, you still around? I noticed you uploaded an image of Anette Olzon at Wikimedia Commons. Could you please upload the [http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1848778734&size=l&context=photostream highest resolution] instead? And with a better name (like ''Anette Olzon, Halloween 2007.jpg'')? I would do that, but since it was you the one who uploaded it, I don't want to step over you (especially since the smaller image will have to be deleted). Thanks for catching the image too! -- [[User:ReyBrujo\|ReyBrujo]] 03:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)		Hey there, you still around? I noticed you uploaded an image of Anette Olzon at Wikimedia Commons. Could you please upload the [http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1848778734&size=l&context=photostream highest resolution] instead? And with a better name (like ''Anette Olzon, Halloween 2007.jpg'')? I would do that, but since it was you the one who uploaded it, I don't want to step over you (especially since the smaller image will have to be deleted). Thanks for catching the image too! -- [[User:ReyBrujo\|ReyBrujo]] 03:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
			:Yes, sure, thanks for the image too. Now, there is a slight problem: you uploaded a modified version of the image, therefore the bot that checks whether the image is correctly licensed won't be able to do so. I suggest uploading the original (exact) image from Flickr, and then link the PNG version to the other as a "cropped" version. That way the bot can verify the original image faster. -- [[User:ReyBrujo\|ReyBrujo]] 03:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)