Talk:Dodge Durango: Difference between revisions
fixing last edit |
→The 2005 Update: new section |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Rumors=== |
===Rumors=== |
||
In [[2008]], DaimlerChrysler is expected to introduce a [[hybrid car|hybrid]] version of the Durango which uses the shared [[General Motors|GM]]/DaimlerChrysler [[Advanced Hybrid System 2]]. It is expected to use the 5.7 L [[Chrysler Hemi engine|Hemi]] V8. |
In [[2008]], DaimlerChrysler is expected to introduce a [[hybrid car|hybrid]] version of the Durango which uses the shared [[General Motors|GM]]/DaimlerChrysler [[Advanced Hybrid System 2]]. It is expected to use the 5.7 L [[Chrysler Hemi engine|Hemi]] V8. |
||
== The 2005 Update == |
|||
I think there needs to me more clarification on the 2005 Update. When I first came to this page, I was confused out of my mind why there was a third version showing up on the side bar. So, I tried to put a side by side comparison on the 2004 subsection. I think the way it is now is way too confusing because there's this red herring/outlier of an image at the top, with no explanatory text for the images at all. My attempt to revise was reverted, perhaps someone can suggest a better way to show this?-[[Special:Contributions/146.115.115.184|146.115.115.184]] ([[User talk:146.115.115.184|talk]]) 09:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:50, 28 November 2007
Automobiles Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
'Rumors' section removed from main article
The following appeared as a top-level section — see permalink for version prior to removal. My feeling is that a 'rumors' section really doesn't belong in Wikipedia, at least not without a reference to support it. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Rumors
In 2008, DaimlerChrysler is expected to introduce a hybrid version of the Durango which uses the shared GM/DaimlerChrysler Advanced Hybrid System 2. It is expected to use the 5.7 L Hemi V8.
The 2005 Update
I think there needs to me more clarification on the 2005 Update. When I first came to this page, I was confused out of my mind why there was a third version showing up on the side bar. So, I tried to put a side by side comparison on the 2004 subsection. I think the way it is now is way too confusing because there's this red herring/outlier of an image at the top, with no explanatory text for the images at all. My attempt to revise was reverted, perhaps someone can suggest a better way to show this?-146.115.115.184 (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)