User talk:Ira01

Prosper

Hello. I'm a mediation cabal volunteer, and I've volunteered to mediate the case you opened, over the article Prosper (web site). I would like to mediate this case, which is located at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-11-28 Prosper (web site). I would appreciate it if you would let me know if you'd be willing to participate with me as a mediator. I hope that I can help you solve the problem, and I know that this is an informal process, so please air your doubts if you have any. Thank you. Regards, Neranei (talk) 03:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Response: As long as you are neutral and without a conflict (i.e., you are not friends with Hu12), I am completely willing to participate with you as mediator. Thank you for your time and assistance. Ira01 (talk) 06:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ira01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As far as I can see from reading the rules, I have certainly not vandalised anything. I have simply been engaged in good faith in a content dispute with Hu12. Following wikipedia policies, I intitiated a mediation cabal case over this dispute, which was proceding before I was blocked. As near as I can tell, Hu12 was unhappy that I solicited comments in the mediation cabal case by posting a message on the talk page of about 12 people who had previously made edits to the article in question that Hu12 reverted. I have not seen anything to suggest that was improper, but if it was, I appologize (and would appreciate a link to the policy in question). Thank you for your consideration

Decline reason:

Your first edits were to the medcom page, followed by mass spamming to draw attention to it. This is clear disruption. — Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• This user seems to be using sock accounts and IPs to coninue the disruption, for which s/he was banned for. NewHorizon (talk · contribs)
  66.170.132.194 (talk · contribs).
• Also soliciting off Wiki attacks [1]--Hu12 (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

* Both Ira01 & NewHorizon are completely separate individuals. You can see check their originating IP addresses with GEO LOCATE or their different lending portfolios here: http://www.lendingstats.com/memberProfile?lenderId=ira01 , http://www.lendingstats.com/memberProfile?lenderId=NewHorizon Gothere (talk) 23:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

* Ira01 did not call attention to his blocking. A different user, Greebo, noticed it & called attention to it on the prospers.org forum as shown here: http://prospers.org/forum/index.php?topic=4139.0 Gothere (talk) 23:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• The reviewing admin should also see relevant discussion here. — Satori Son 22:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)