Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reskin Theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
error
Scientizzle (talk | contribs)
hold off...
Line 7: Line 7:


*'''Speedy delete''' per nom. [[User:Michaelbusch|Michaelbusch]] 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per nom. [[User:Michaelbusch|Michaelbusch]] 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Commnet''' Creator has been attempting a rewrite. I have requested verifiable sources.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 22:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Creator has been attempting a rewrite. I have requested verifiable sources.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 22:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

*'''Hold off on the speedy deletion''' I'm working with the article creator, {{user|Krstn4}} to morph some of the content here into an article on [[Barbara Reskin]]. &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 23:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:08, 3 December 2007

Reskin Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Speedy tagged as advert. I declined because I cannot assess subject's notability. It may just need a rewrite. Subject's works are the main source for the article Don't know which way to go with this, so AfD. Looks like ad or OR. Dlohcierekim 22:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]