Jump to content

User talk:SMC89: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Border: Reply
Line 262: Line 262:


:Sorry, I tried to put the code into this message but it wouldn't work properly so you can just copy and paste from mine. If you have any questions just ask =) happy editing! [[User:SMC89|SMC89]] <sup>( [[User_talk:SMC89|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SMC89|contribs]] )</sup> 12:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
:Sorry, I tried to put the code into this message but it wouldn't work properly so you can just copy and paste from mine. If you have any questions just ask =) happy editing! [[User:SMC89|SMC89]] <sup>( [[User_talk:SMC89|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SMC89|contribs]] )</sup> 12:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


Thank you very much mate it helped I'm happy with the colour the way it is it looks pretty cool actually. I was doing a bit of digging and i found your also a member of WikiProject: The Bill and btw I just lurve the bill lol. But its a damn shame that project has gone into isolation, dont ya think??

[[User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]]

Revision as of 20:01, 8 December 2007

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DC Kate Spears.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DC Kate Spears.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 21 June 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 06:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Meetup Notification

WikiClubWest logo Perth Meetup

See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PC Delia French.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Delia French.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 9 April 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 06:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


TOPIC: HOMER FLYNN

I am sorry if this is the wrong place, for this. But, thank you very much, I do not understand all of this stuff. I also dont know how to message you, or else I would have done that, Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.87.116 (talkcontribs)

You're very welcome, I hope you guys can sort something out over the next few days. I've got the article on my watchlist so I'll keep an eye on what's going on just in case I need to give you a hand again. Feel free to leave comments here like you did, all you have to do is press the + button at the top =) SMC89 14:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse

Excuse me, I just wanted to revert a vandalism, but I took the wrong edit in the history page...I didn't want to vandalize that page. Fabio

My apologies if I have made a mistake, the edit summary appeared to suggest that you were the one vandalising! SMC89 12:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The revert

Thanks. :) Acalamari 02:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all =) SMC89 02:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I was experimenting on Wikipedia, please delete it or whatever needs to be done.

Sorry.

Lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by CTLMJN (talkcontribs)

Yep fair enough, it's proposed for speedy deletion. It's probably best to use the Sandbox for your test edits since it's supposed to be an encyclopedia! =) SMC89 14:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Let's jsut forget I put this here then, my mistake! :) Wildthing61476 02:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol no problem =) SMC89 02:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pollokshields Minimarket

You can't delete the article! I've just begun! I'm looking for refernces and the popularity of this market is of the highest callibre! YOU CAN'T DELETE IT! And Why? The market has been a popular place for people there! LOTRrules 11:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that article, I thought it might meet the criteria for speedy deletion and an admin must have decided that it did and deleted it. If you want to recreate the article and maybe put an under construction tag on it or something and state that you're trying to find references. Otherwise you'd need to state it's significance clearly and put in the references when you first create the article so that another editor doesn't tag it for deletion as well.
Once again, sorry =) SMC89 01:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I hereby award SMC89 your first barnstar for continued work in reporting and reverting vandals. You have been extremely helpful over the last few weeks in your amount of reverts and reports. Keep up the good work. Khukri 13:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Wow thanks so much =) That's really made my day! It's been great to learn about Wikipedia, how it works and the policies that are in place and I was hoping I was doing it all properly and I guess that's my answer! So thanks! SMC89 13:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problems at all, and if you ever have any questions, etc don't hesitate to give me a shout. Khukri 13:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Druid Order Page

Hi there

Allen he's got no telly here, I didn't remove it malicously I only did it after checking a couple of things. 1. The wikipedia Artcile on John Toland himself has the same content and no notability notice. 2. The OBOD article carries the same story (albiet without the refernce to John Toland) that article is pretty similar to what I am trying to do (doucment a Druid order)

I've also added in some source references, so let me know if you think these are up to scratch or not.

All the best

Sorry if that came across wrong, I didn't mean to accuse you of doing it maliciously =) I added the notice because I wasn't sure whether it was notable or not since I'm not familiar with the topic! It's looking good so far, the best thing you could probably do is keep going with adding information about the Order and its role/significance and then just reference some external sources at the bottom of the article with the usual 'ref' tags. All the best to you too =) SMC89 12:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No Worries. -- Allen

National Tramway Museum

Yes - I am sorry about that edit - I am new to Wikipedia, and was trying to change the article. I wanted to make a comment, and thought that you had to remove the current article and it would be added to the bottom - my bad!

Sorry 86.128.14.20 12:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there =) Welcome to wikipedia then! There's a few pages out there that might help you with your editing (Cheatsheet and Tutorial spring to mind). If you've got any questions, feel free to ask! Thanks for the explanation. SMC89 12:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Hi. I just reverted some vandalism on the Peter Costello page and when I tried to warn the IP it told me an identical warn had just been issued by you. So I checked the page history to make sure I had reverted the vandalism. Now I'm just wondering why you warned the IP if I reverted it? Thanks for clearing this up! Deflagro Contribs/Talk 14:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah this happens occassionally, I'm using Twinkle and when I click the rollback button it does it's thing without any warnings (i.e. of someone else already having reverted it) and then it turns out someone actually has somehow got in there first and made the revert. Usually it will tell me that someone's done it but it must be something to do with the timing of page loads etc.SMC89 14:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah okay! I also use Twinkle and I know it sometimes tell me warnings. Good job though on the vandal-fighting! Deflagro Contribs/Talk 14:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, same to you =) SMC89 14:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I apologize for my imature behaviour, it is a promise I will think twice before I decide to vandalise a page. I am really, really sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.12.90 (talkcontribs)

Hey, thanks for the apology, it's more than some people give! It's great that you've come to edit Wikipedia, I'm sure there's something out there that you'll enjoy editing. If you've got any questions, just ask =) SMC89 02:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Person chemistry

Hi!

I am a Swede, who has started to learn more about how to use Wiki. I searched for Person Chemistry and found nothing. Therefore I did an article, but obviously with many mistakes. Then I searched for Personal Chemistry and was redircted to Interpersonal Chemistry and learned a new word in English. The word is very useful to me, because I have worked with Interpersonal Chemistry since 1988 with a certain methodology, which I have developed myself. It is based on the fact that the personality influences a lot the Interpersonal Chemistry between two persons.

My wishes is now -to add a redirection from person chemistry to Interpersonal Chemistry (good for at least Swedes) -to add to the Interpersonal Chemistry article about my findings that similarities in personality goes along well, except for people with a lot of exposure need, because they could be rival about the audience. Differences in personality can cause irritation/conflicts. However persons with high self-esteem see most often the differences as complementary, but for persons with low self-esteem the difference can cause a thret, because they don't understand the other person's personality.

All the best Rolf

p.s. Google me, if you wish information about me. d.s.

Hi Rolf, welcome to Wikipedia =) There are a few guidelines that govern what we can and can't add to Wikipedia. I proposed deletion of the article because it read like a dictionary entry which is one of the things that Wikipedia is not.
In answer to your questions:
  • To redirect the Person chemistry page, just click on that red link and type "#REDIRECT [[Interpersonal chemistry]]" without the quotes and save the page. The next time you navigate to your new page, it will go straight to the other article.
  • It's great that you have some information to add to the Interpersonal chemistry article, just make sure that you read through the What wikipedia is not article so that you are clear on concepts such as original research. Things that you add should, where possible, be supported by citations to reliable external sources. If there is anything contraversial that you wish to add, it's best to discuss your thoughts on the article's talk page first.
Good luck =) If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask! SMC89 06:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, but that editor is not likely to contact you. I've indefblocked the account for spamming. The editor blanked my block message. -- Gogo Dodo 08:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't check the history! I was wondering when that was going to happen though! I was going to report the name but found that I had to discuss it first but now it looks like that won't be needed =) Thanks, SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 08:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: No worries. =) Just an FYI, but the editor is back with another account: China Det Inspection (talk · contribs). When I think about it some more, this company sounds familiar to me like I've run across it before. I'll have to dig around. -- Gogo Dodo 08:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 09:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, there's been a few nasty comments today...just reverted one off my own talk page! Not to mention discovering some usernames created as personal attacks against me a while back. Nice to know that some civil people still exist =P Cheers, SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 09:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: That just means you're doing a good job. =) -- Gogo Dodo 18:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

per your request

I am still trying to figure out how and where the heck things go inside of Wikipedia, so i had responded here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Walt%27s_Jewelers .

Thanks for the heads-up; I've commented there. Lectonar 15:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

page on 'Kildalkey'

This is my first article. I've 'cleaned up' the page as best I can and introduced sections, but you still ask for more. What should I do now? Hpotterton 17:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for attending to that. It sounds like you're taking offence to my request but I may be wrong - I haven't asked anything else of you =) Since you ask though, if you had a free image and some other information other than history, it would make the article even better. Thanks, SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 10:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No offence taken at all. Just trying to get it right. I'll add in some more information. Thanks for your help. Hpotterton 11:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome =) I'm looking forward to seeing the masterpiece when you're done! If you need any more help just let me know and I'll be happy to take a look. SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sanko Pazarlama

Hello, i just would like to thank you for your attention to my work. Let me prove if I edit right: You can look at web site of sanko holding: www.sanko.com.tr. You will see that owners of Sanko Pazarlama and Sanko Holding are the same. Also you can visit Istanbul Chamber of Trade to see if Sanko is really largest congloramate of Anatolia. Thank you for your attention. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianithaca (talkcontribs) 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi =) It's not really the fact that you have written anything wrong - it's just that the article did not meet Wikipedia's standards because it was so short providing little context to readers. If you want to recreate the article then it is important that you assert the company's significance and you would need to expand the article. If it is an arm of Sanko Holding, perhaps it would be better to include your information on that parent article and create a redirect to that instead if you're not confident that you can add enough information for an article of its own. Good luck =) If you have any questions, just ask! SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 08:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I have nothing to say other than "yes you are right". Thank you for your support. Not easy to reply like I had from you, so can you please read my article about Hakan Ozkok. It was going to be deleted but I put a hang on. So its still there. That guy is really one of the most interesting personality in this region and he is on regional TV channels time to time. Its a very populated region and very important area and he is planing to get into elections so I am sure people need information about him. Please provide me any help so that article stays in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianithaca (talkcontribs) 10 August 2007 (UTC)
You're very welcome =) Regarding Hakan Ozkok, it's a good contribution so far so thanks very much. The reason that the article was proposed for deletion is due to notability issues. First of all I'd reccomend that you read Wikipedia's notability guidelines to see what is expected of an article about a person. Also, there are guidelines for biographies of living persons which are also important. In short you basically need to make sure you state why he is important and back this up with links to websites or information from books etc. For example, if he is going up for elections then make sure you say in the article what the election is for and how he is involved. Good luck =) SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 08:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3 is next sunday 19th August, if you haven't already please sign on the meetup page if your coming, if your still unsure indicate anyway so I can confirm numbers with the venue thankyou Gnangarra 00:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Stefanovic Vandalism?

Am I being targeted? You have missed a major mistake on Karl's page but chose to change my edit. It was my belief that karl is a robot and that R2D2 was his child. Obviously I had been misled and that will teach me not to check my sources more thouroughly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dizzystufffolks (talkcontribs) 12:29, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

No it's not just you that's being targeted, you are a vandal and all vandals are targeted. It's childish behaviour and fair enough if they are your beliefs, but they are clearly false and therefore have no place here on Wikipedia so please take a hint and vandalise somewhere else. SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 13:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You missed my point

There is still robotic refernces to Karl and they have not been removed so maybe my information was correct. However, I will take your word for it that Karl is not a robot —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dizzystufffolks (talkcontribs) 10:55, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Jollyrogerexplorerunit

Shame on you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by JollyRogerExplorerUnit (talkcontribs) 12:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of personal opinion regarding your article, it is simply a matter of Wikipedia policy regarding notability. Please read these guidelines and try to improve the article to prevent deletion. Thanks, SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 12:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Chisholm Perth Crest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Chisholm Perth Crest.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 16 September 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 06:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging

Good work on tagging! I found it sort of funny that this was written in not all caps, which you tagged, but every word in caps! [1]! Hmmm...indeed. Phgao 13:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate. I didn't actually notice the caps until you mentioned it - I just scanned a few lines and thought...hmmm borderline notability!! lol, have a good night =) SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 13:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh quick here's another funny one, and good night to you too! It's just hit 11pm here. [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phgao (talkcontribs) 13:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, now it's "Wikipedia - the anti-dictionary"! SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 13:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PC Amber Johannsen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Amber Johannsen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 2 December 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PC Gary McCann.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Gary McCann.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 2 December 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PC Mike Jarvis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Mike Jarvis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 2 December 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PC Sheelagh Murphy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Sheelagh Murphy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with this edit on 2 December 2007 SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PC Gemma Osbourne.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Gemma Osbourne.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image still in use on the Gemma Osbourne article, so notification appears to be in error. Also fixed rationale with this edit SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 11:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Border

Hey mate, how are you? i'd like to visit Australia one day its got better wheather that sunny old England lol. I was just wondering you see that border you have i'm interested in getting one of those is their a page where you can choose from them like the Wiki Userboxes or something else?

Thanks in advance

Police,Mad,Jack

Hey, I'm very well thanks =) I think you'd really enjoy Australia, I hope you can make it out here one day!
I nicked the border off someone else's page and modified it and you're more than welcome to do the same here. I've simplified my coding a bit for you by inserting little tags so you can find it. Just begin editing my userpage/talk page and copy and paste the coding for the page border - it's at the very top. Insert it at the top of your coding and change the hex values to change colours to your liking. If you're unfamiliar with hex values, there's a simple colour chart at http://html-color-codes.com
Sorry, I tried to put the code into this message but it wouldn't work properly so you can just copy and paste from mine. If you have any questions just ask =) happy editing! SMC89 ( talkcontribs ) 12:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you very much mate it helped I'm happy with the colour the way it is it looks pretty cool actually. I was doing a bit of digging and i found your also a member of WikiProject: The Bill and btw I just lurve the bill lol. But its a damn shame that project has gone into isolation, dont ya think??

Police,Mad,Jack