User talk:Matt57: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 21d) to User talk:Matt57/Archive 4. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
:Wikipedia is an objective project. The only problem I see here is the proposed censorship of information which myself and many others should be permitted to access. Understand that not everyone is a strict Muslim, and that the censorship of pictures which really do not offend most readers (including many Muslims) is tantamount to the misguided logic of the prohibition and other such movements. In short: to each his own.--[[User:C.Logan|C.Logan]] ([[User talk:C.Logan|talk]]) 08:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
:Wikipedia is an objective project. The only problem I see here is the proposed censorship of information which myself and many others should be permitted to access. Understand that not everyone is a strict Muslim, and that the censorship of pictures which really do not offend most readers (including many Muslims) is tantamount to the misguided logic of the prohibition and other such movements. In short: to each his own.--[[User:C.Logan|C.Logan]] ([[User talk:C.Logan|talk]]) 08:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Accusation of Sockpuppetry== |
|||
*Just so you know, your constant accusations of [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry|sockpuppetry]], as amusing as it may be, is going to stop. Since you have made no effort to complain to [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets|Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets]], it can only be assumed that your purpose is in direct conflict with the notions of [[Wikipedia:Civil#Examples|Wikipedia:Civility]]. In other words, you are intending to threaten or harass another user within the confines of the system, for the purpose of intimidation. I personally find this amusing, but it is becoming rather disruptive, as another editor named [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] has used your unsubstantiated accusations as an excuse to undo or remove <b><i>ANY</b></i> edit that I may make, on the grounds that I was somehow banned as a sockpuppet at some point in time. This cannot be allowed, and I am fully prepared to lodge a complaint with [[Wikipedia:ANI]] if you fail to respond promptly. What you are doing, after all, is a clear cut case of [[Wikipedia:Harassment|harassment and wikistalking]] <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 10:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:30, 27 December 2007
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Organization of British ex-Muslims
The organization has 25 founding members and an unknown number of additional members. It is not significant enough to warrant a section on the Islam in the United Kingdom page. If you were to add a section for every group with so few members or impact on the general British Muslim population the article would be endless.
If such a section is added to the Islam in the United Kingdom article then equally sections on apostacy, scularism and athiesm added to the British Jews article and Church of England article. Please do not try to threaten me or taint the Wikipedia project with your Athiest extremist point of view.
Articles that are counterparts on the same subject such as Religion do matter. Wikipedia cannot be seen to be or actually be bias as it will destory the credibility of the whole project. While this organization has been heralded in the media its impact on the actual British Muslim community has been neglible as its numbers suggest. The Sufi Muslim Council also is notable but it does not have its own section and is only mentioned in the Political organisations and pressure groups section. Feel free to add the Organization of British ex-Muslims to the latter section.
I do not have the verifiable data or information on apostacy, scularism and athiesm in the Jewish and Christian communities of Britain and would not attempt to make the needed and factual changes without doing so.
Abuse of Power
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Edina_Lekovic
Tahrir-ol-vasyleh
Do you have access to this book? Tahrir-ol-vasyleh. Want to verify the infamous "thighing" quote. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 03:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- There is a link on the site to the an arabic copy.--CltFn (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Elonka adminship
"Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy." Sound familiar? Mindraker (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes very. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 22:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I just thought I'd say that although we don't have the same opinions about this AfD, I appreciate the way that you have remained calm in what must be a difficult topic for you. If you have any concerns or problems in the future and think I might be able to help, I hope the fact that we have disagreed on this subject will not make you at all hesitant to contact me. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 06:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Tim. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again. Now (almost) all of the drama has died down, I thought I would contact you and a few other users who opposed the RfA. Since I helped Elonka get adminship I now share the responsibility if you are correct and she misuses the tools. I still think this is unlikely, but if you do become aware of any such abuse could I ask you to contact me and I will try to deal with it. I don't want any future "dramabomb" and I may have a better chance of being able to mediate and defuse conflicts. Anyway, I don't think this will be necessary, but I thought making this offer might help avert any future problems. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, but if you need any help or advice please feel free to contact me. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- I just thought I'd say that although we don't have the same opinions about this AfD, I appreciate the way that you have remained calm in what must be a difficult topic for you. If you have any concerns or problems in the future and think I might be able to help, I hope the fact that we have disagreed on this subject will not make you at all hesitant to contact me. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 06:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Matt, please rest assured that I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm going to take it slow for now -- I'm working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school, carefully investigating the admin tools and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, though I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know. My door is always open. --Elonka 07:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Juletr%C3%A6et.jpg/90px-Juletr%C3%A6et.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/Lorenzo_Lotto_017.jpg/90px-Lorenzo_Lotto_017.jpg)
Dear Matt57, at this season of THE WINTER SOLSTICE, may reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven, no hell. There is only the natural world. Religion is but myth and superstition that harden hearts and enslaves minds.
Kirbytime sen't me this a year ago, and i liked it, so merry christmas, and see you next year. Yahel Guhan 23:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Images of Muhammad(PBUH)
I know nothing new is going to happen that is why i am calling arbitration on this article, this is not a issue of censorship or respecting polices, this is a issue of respect and reality. you can not use these 2 to change the religion of others and misguide next generation. its a fight for right to represent truth about a faith. --Faraz Ahmad (talk) 05:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an objective project. The only problem I see here is the proposed censorship of information which myself and many others should be permitted to access. Understand that not everyone is a strict Muslim, and that the censorship of pictures which really do not offend most readers (including many Muslims) is tantamount to the misguided logic of the prohibition and other such movements. In short: to each his own.--C.Logan (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Accusation of Sockpuppetry
- Just so you know, your constant accusations of sockpuppetry, as amusing as it may be, is going to stop. Since you have made no effort to complain to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets, it can only be assumed that your purpose is in direct conflict with the notions of Wikipedia:Civility. In other words, you are intending to threaten or harass another user within the confines of the system, for the purpose of intimidation. I personally find this amusing, but it is becoming rather disruptive, as another editor named Arrow740 has used your unsubstantiated accusations as an excuse to undo or remove ANY edit that I may make, on the grounds that I was somehow banned as a sockpuppet at some point in time. This cannot be allowed, and I am fully prepared to lodge a complaint with Wikipedia:ANI if you fail to respond promptly. What you are doing, after all, is a clear cut case of harassment and wikistalking Atari400 10:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)