Talk:Sources of Sharia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bless sins (talk | contribs) →Proposed move: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
An alternative, more technical title would be: "Sources of Islamic jurisprudence".[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 00:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
An alternative, more technical title would be: "Sources of Islamic jurisprudence".[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 00:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Sharia is now an English word, and the most appropriate. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 01:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:01, 3 January 2008
 | Law Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
I oppose this article's merger into Sharia, as the latter is quite big.Bless sins (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Proposed move
I propose we move this article to "Sources of Islamic law" from the current title "Sources of sharia". This is because wikipedia is an English language encyclopedia, and the proposed title is easier to understand by an English speaking audience than the current one.
An alternative, more technical title would be: "Sources of Islamic jurisprudence".Bless sins (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sharia is now an English word, and the most appropriate. Arrow740 (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)