Jump to content

Commercial off-the-shelf: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blanked the page
m Reverted 1 edit by 89.105.101.248 identified as vandalism to last revision by ClueBot. using TW
Line 1: Line 1:
{{citations missing|date=October 2007}}
'''Commercial off-the-shelf''' ('''COTS''') is a term for [[software]] or [[hardware]], generally technology or computer products, that are ready-made and available for sale, lease, or license to the general public. They are often used as alternatives to in-house developments or one-off [[Government off-the-shelf|government-funded developments]]. The use of COTS is being mandated across many government and business programs, as they may offer significant savings in procurement and maintenance. However, since COTS software specifications are written by external sources, government agencies are sometimes wary of these products because they fear that future changes to the product will not be under their control.

Note that most existing [[open source software]] is COTS, as it is licensed to the public. Some claim that fact invalidates the loss-of-control argument since the source code is available. The other school of thought insists on broader meaning of the loss-of-control argument, equating it with loss-of-functional-control where control is not defined as 'access to code', but 'realistic ability to manipulate the code.'

The motivation for using COTS components is that they will reduce overall system development costs and involve less development time because the components can be bought instead of being developed from scratch. Many considered COTS to be the [[Silver bullet]] during the nineties, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs - overall cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component integration work and a dependency on a third-party component vendor. The extra integration work and modifications often required have led to the joke that COTS really means '''''custom''''' off-the-shelf.

Several groups have been formed to encourage the development of COTS systems for various purposes and promote their adoption. The [[Mountain View Alliance]] is one such group.

==References==
* [http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/commercial-floss.html “Commercial” is not the opposite of Free-Libre / Open Source Software (FLOSS)]
* [http://www.diversifiedtechnology.com/whitepapers/focused_cots-wiki.pdf "Focused COTS and the Cohesive Approach to Embedded Systems" Whitepaper]
* [http://www.gefanucembedded.com/news-events/whitepapers/1073/AFC-WIK Ruggedization for COTS Systems White Paper]

[[Category:Computing terminology]]

[[de:COTS]]
[[it:COTS]]
[[ja:商用オフザシェルフ]]
[[ru:Коробочный программный продукт]]
[[fi:COTS]]

Revision as of 17:24, 7 January 2008

Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) is a term for software or hardware, generally technology or computer products, that are ready-made and available for sale, lease, or license to the general public. They are often used as alternatives to in-house developments or one-off government-funded developments. The use of COTS is being mandated across many government and business programs, as they may offer significant savings in procurement and maintenance. However, since COTS software specifications are written by external sources, government agencies are sometimes wary of these products because they fear that future changes to the product will not be under their control.

Note that most existing open source software is COTS, as it is licensed to the public. Some claim that fact invalidates the loss-of-control argument since the source code is available. The other school of thought insists on broader meaning of the loss-of-control argument, equating it with loss-of-functional-control where control is not defined as 'access to code', but 'realistic ability to manipulate the code.'

The motivation for using COTS components is that they will reduce overall system development costs and involve less development time because the components can be bought instead of being developed from scratch. Many considered COTS to be the Silver bullet during the nineties, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs - overall cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component integration work and a dependency on a third-party component vendor. The extra integration work and modifications often required have led to the joke that COTS really means custom off-the-shelf.

Several groups have been formed to encourage the development of COTS systems for various purposes and promote their adoption. The Mountain View Alliance is one such group.

References