User talk:MKoltnow

Hi there. If our discussion has begun on your talk page, please keep it there. I will watch for it there. If you would like to start a discussion with me, please do so at the bottom of this page.

Interesting comment and question by you here

I noted your interesting comment and implicit question. I was going to try and leave this page alone but your comment was positive and I thought it deserved a follow up. Take care.--VS ^talk 04:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for having a look. I always think of myself as smarter than your average bear, but I can't figure that one out. Either it's serious, in which case I simply cannot follow the assertion that social engineering is malware spam, followed by what appears to be a diatribe invoking several wp-abbreviated (but not piped) policies which seem, at best, loosely connected to the original assertion. Or it's a joke, in which case, it's executed poorly, as the early paragraphs contain the complex humour, but they're perplexingly followed by serious policy discussion. I'm concerned by the creator's awarding of barnstars to loosely affiliated admins effectively congratulating himself on his essay. Problem for me is, I don't know where to take it from here. I'm sure that the article belongs in the bin. Whether the creator's judgement and poor behaviour (things such as mis-indents which have the effect of making it look as if self-paid compliments came from others) is subject to sanction remains to be seen. I won't rush to MfD, but I won't drag my feet either. MKoltnow 05:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes I will be watching closely as well. You should feel free to contact me at any time to discuss.--VS ^talk 08:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

You may be watching but if not then here for further returns on this joke page.--VS ^talk 10:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Your comments

Thank you for your observations. The troll Internet I agree with you and other editors and will not add the statment again. Cheers, Igor Berger (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• This is an excellent synopsis of the situation concerning Igorberger and you receive my commendation for taking the time to try and present him with an overview of his problematic editing. I very much hope that he adjusts considerably as a result. Best wishes.--VS ^talk 03:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Erm, well synopsis may not be quite the right word. Tome, monograph, or long-winded diatribe may be more accurate. I appreciate your compliment, but I fear I failed the brevity test. MKoltnow 03:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Let me put it this way - I am 194cm - tall heh?, but not when I stand next to some of my basket-balling colleagues who are well over 200cm. Yours was a "synopsis" of great clarity when I look at the voluminous material that you were trying to incorporate. I also note that his return comment in another thread (lower on this page) still leaves me with much concern but I keep my fingers crossed. Cheers!--VS ^talk 03:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you help

Need help with an editor User:Maglev_Power He is removing the word Totalitarianism from many articles. here Regards, Igor Berger (talk) 01:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I think this issue is being dealt with on his talk page pretty effectively. MKoltnow 01:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Now you may understand why I may look out of place. I am a security analyst, so I deal with Spam, Malware, and vandals. Cheers, Igor Berger (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Help, please.

I just saw this and I have to say: If you really have that much patience, there's another user I'd appreciate it if you could speak to.

BigK HeX (talk · contribs). So far, he's been pretty much a single-purpose account, to push the conspiracy theory, "The Federal Reserve is secretly bankrupting America," on Monetary policy of the USA. ☯  Zenwhat (talk) 08:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)