User talk:Deryck Chan/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 21 July 2005

Please note:

I'll choose to reply on this page, your talk page, or not replying, as the case might be. --Deryck C. 2005-07-01 11:37:47 (UTC)

For older comments, please see:

/Archive 1 (28.6.2005 ~ 7.7.2005)
/Archive 2 (7.7.2005 ~ 20.7.2005)

Deryck's Stand

(see /Archive 2 and User talk:Huaiwei for related discussions)

It may surprise you if I tell you that I never intended to "back Instantnood" by any means - at least, I opposed having the HK flag coming with a "national flag status". What I'm doing is just to try asserting my own opinions and views and apply them on wikipedia.

I often thought that things on wikipedia are really too tight. People in FAC discussion cross out 80% of my comments by a reason "not conforming/applying to FAS rules". As I can see, most wikipedians are doing exactly the same, and this is what I'm afraid of.

I just really, really hope that you're not going to fall into the same trap by applying man-made rules without a room for exception.

It's seen by all of us that, despite the general rules for a "national library", the Catalonian Library went onto the list. My view is that, if there's one exception, why can't there be another? Life and rules shall all be flexible.

However your view is that, we've violate the rule once. Of course we don't want to violate it twice.

There's no absolute right or wrong between the 2 views (the believer of a flexible life and the believer of absolutely correct rules). However, should the custom "do in Rome what the Romans do" a better way to solve this problem?

Hoping for your reply. Deryck C. 07:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know that I do intend to reply to you with regards to the above. But as I am reallymentaly drained now, and not exactly "in the mood" yet, I will do so a little later or tomorrow. Hope you dont mind the delay, and wont think that I have abandoned all negotiations. Thank you for your kind understanding and God bless! ;)--Huaiwei 13:04, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for voting in my RfA; I promise I'll wield my sacred mop with care. If you ever need me for anything, you know where to find me. Thanks again! -- Essjay · Talk 15:30, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for giving thanks back!!! ^_^ Deryck C. 04:31, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deryck's Stand (con't 1)

Replying Huaiwei:

It's true that I've seen your delays in replying to our acts. In fact, recently I'm in quite a conflict with Instantnood about the "national flag" stuff. Everybody got his unique stand, but by concensus I hope all of us can work well together!!! Deryck C. 13:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:41, 21 July 2005 edit Deryck Chan (talk \| contribs) Administrators 22,728 edits →‎Thanks ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:49, 21 July 2005 edit undo Mcy jerry (talk \| contribs) 5,501 edits m →‎Deryck's Stand (con't 1) Next edit →
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Replying Huaiwei:		Replying Huaiwei:

	It's true that I've ~~saw~~ your delays in replying to our acts. In fact, recently I'm in quite a conflict with Instantnood about the "national flag" stuff. Everybody got his unique stand, but by concensus I hope all of us can work well together!!! [[User:Deryck Chan\|Deryck C.]] 13:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)		It's true that I've seen your delays in replying to our acts. In fact, recently I'm in quite a conflict with Instantnood about the "national flag" stuff. Everybody got his unique stand, but by concensus I hope all of us can work well together!!! [[User:Deryck Chan\|Deryck C.]] 13:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)