Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific spirituality: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m cat |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Religion|list of Religion-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism|talk]]) 01:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Religion|list of Religion-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism|talk]]) 01:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' as a barely coherent personal essay in violation of [[WP:NOT#OR]] point #3. The article contains this sentence which, on top of the [[WP:NPOV]] issue is invokes, looks to be its thesis "The union of science and spirituality is destined and must happen." The only directly referenced statements are quotes taken from other works, and the rest of the work is tangential argument in support of a point of view. ⇔ [[User:AubreyEllenShomo|∫'''Æ<small><sub>S</sub></small>''']] [[User talk:AubreyEllenShomo|<i><small>dt</small></i>]] @ 01:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as a barely coherent personal essay in violation of [[WP:NOT#OR]] point #3. The article contains this sentence which, on top of the [[WP:NPOV]] issue is invokes, looks to be its thesis "The union of science and spirituality is destined and must happen." The only directly referenced statements are quotes taken from other works, and the rest of the work is tangential argument in support of a point of view. ⇔ [[User:AubreyEllenShomo|∫'''Æ<small><sub>S</sub></small>''']] [[User talk:AubreyEllenShomo|<i><small>dt</small></i>]] @ 01:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep''' '''HOLD ON''' lets give it a chance its promising.[[User:Myheartinchile|Myheartinchile]] ([[User talk:Myheartinchile|talk]]) 04:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:20, 28 June 2008
Scientific spirituality
- Scientific spirituality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable with no reliable sources and lots of original research. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 01:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as a barely coherent personal essay in violation of WP:NOT#OR point #3. The article contains this sentence which, on top of the WP:NPOV issue is invokes, looks to be its thesis "The union of science and spirituality is destined and must happen." The only directly referenced statements are quotes taken from other works, and the rest of the work is tangential argument in support of a point of view. ⇔ ∫ÆS dt @ 01:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- keep HOLD ON lets give it a chance its promising.Myheartinchile (talk) 04:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)