User talk:Allemandtando: Difference between revisions
m →"the cancer that is destroying Wikipedia": new section |
→"the cancer that is destroying Wikipedia": may happen. Not that specific user, maybe, but the effects of this user's participation are wide. I have not seen but a small fraction. |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Maybe we can get [[User:Radiant!]] to stand next to you, and it will count as [[radiotherapy]]? <tt>:-P</tt> --<span style="color:blue">[[User talk:Grey Knight|<sub>tiny plastic</sub> Grey Knight]]</span> <span style="color:#777">[[User:tiny plastic Grey Knight|⊖]]</span> 15:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
Maybe we can get [[User:Radiant!]] to stand next to you, and it will count as [[radiotherapy]]? <tt>:-P</tt> --<span style="color:blue">[[User talk:Grey Knight|<sub>tiny plastic</sub> Grey Knight]]</span> <span style="color:#777">[[User:tiny plastic Grey Knight|⊖]]</span> 15:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
:That may be happening. In any possible ArbComm case over this user's behavior, if it comes to that, others who have actively encouraged and cheered it (and to some extent enabled it) will, quite likely, be included. (As well as those who have severely criticized it and who are asserted to have been uncivil to the user.) --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 15:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:18, 2 July 2008
![]() | If your message is rude, templated, and/or begins with "Welcome to Wikipedia!", it will be reverted upon me seeing it. Note: Thank you notes are not included in this warning. |
Warhammer ding-dong
Conversation moved here so it can be properly captured by the project - please carry it on there
MKR closure
Assuming it sticks, which I would suspect it will... Can you say "vindicated"? :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- DR (Delete Review? Disaster Recovery? A bit of both?) is fine. They'll reach the same conclusion. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
More warhammer stuff
Interesting how quickly your rule of "6. Editting all the articles that revolve around a certain universe with the excuse of "in-universe perspective" being used." got pulled from your "How to spot you have gone wrong in your article editing". Possibly because it was hilariously hypocritical? Who knows.
- page of his, mirrored on my User page. This kind of blatant hypocrisy regarding articles should be noted.GameJunkieJim (talk) 06:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Em you do notice that rule six wasn't added by me? --Allemandtando (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
WR article
If you can find anything else, I would be very, very impressed indeed. I'm pretty good at digging up references and I think I've pretty much found everything reliable. Neıl 龱 17:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hmm
This is a little over-the-top. Just sayin. Friday (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Removal of thread
Good call on the removal of that thread from ANI. DuncanHill (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- (ec):Agreed. I don't necessarily agree with your standpoint on some articles but I do agree that raising a thread against a respected editor who is currently grieving is inappropriate. Preferably, Jeff would have time to gather his thoughts off-wiki in this difficult time, but he has had much support from his colleagues here and values that support. I wouldn't have posted that to his talk page at this time, and wouldn't have been surprised if Jeff had reacted in the way he did. For the first time in many years, I shed tears when I read Jeff's words, and am doing so now. He has been lucky in finding a loving soulmate. The thread should not even have been started, and you were right to delete it. --Rodhullandemu 22:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
"the cancer that is destroying Wikipedia"
Maybe we can get User:Radiant! to stand next to you, and it will count as radiotherapy? :-P --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 15:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- That may be happening. In any possible ArbComm case over this user's behavior, if it comes to that, others who have actively encouraged and cheered it (and to some extent enabled it) will, quite likely, be included. (As well as those who have severely criticized it and who are asserted to have been uncivil to the user.) --Abd (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)