Jump to content

User talk:MichaelTinkler/Old: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Paul Drye (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Larry_Sanger (talk)
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:


:This being the key. Don't argue with them, what's the point? You're right, they're wrong. Run through historical crap with a steamroller and don't explain. I'm finding this arrogant attitude to be very helpful myself :) -- [[Paul Drye]]
:This being the key. Don't argue with them, what's the point? You're right, they're wrong. Run through historical crap with a steamroller and don't explain. I'm finding this arrogant attitude to be very helpful myself :) -- [[Paul Drye]]



:In the specific instance of Michael editing certain persons' historical work, I would support this resolution as well. Good luck! (Now departing Gallup, NM.) --[[LMS]]

Revision as of 17:15, 22 January 2002

Thanks for your messages. I'm not leaving - I'm just going to
  1. stick very narrowly to writing about what I care about


I do not know if Art falls into this category, but in Art/Talk Larry Sanger writes: 'MichaelTinkler, help!!!'--branko


  1. edit bad work without explanation unless it is requested
  1. forget about trying to teach - which is hard for me to resist
    1. write a few 'tools' entries, which will be 'teaching', but which I think we need.




edit bad work without explanation unless it is requested


This being the key. Don't argue with them, what's the point? You're right, they're wrong. Run through historical crap with a steamroller and don't explain. I'm finding this arrogant attitude to be very helpful myself :) -- Paul Drye


In the specific instance of Michael editing certain persons' historical work, I would support this resolution as well. Good luck! (Now departing Gallup, NM.) --LMS