Jump to content

User talk:Fritzpoll: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 52: Line 52:


Hey I made some templates for El Salvador at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject El Salvador/Department templates]]. El Salvador has to be one of the poorest covered countries on here. At least we now have the municipalities connected [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey I made some templates for El Salvador at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject El Salvador/Department templates]]. El Salvador has to be one of the poorest covered countries on here. At least we now have the municipalities connected [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
::That's cool. I'm having to rewrite the bot quite a lot - really sorry. I'm feeling quite bad about the slipping deadline [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll#top|talk]]) 21:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


== WP:PERM ==
== WP:PERM ==

Revision as of 21:47, 26 July 2008







Rollback request

I thought it was not different to installing Twinkle. The only reason I asked for Rollback again is because Vandal Fighter is crashing my laptop constantly, which actually makes it hard to "gain more experience with reverting vandalism". But, it's cool. I'll try again next month, I guess. Hamako 17:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TWINKLE is fine, just a little slower than rollback. If you're having trouble getting Twinkle working, I can probably set it up for you. Fritzpoll (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't forgot about this Fritz, wanted to offer quick thoughts. The problem (or lack thereof) of Beer is that its generally written well (so not much in terms of obvious copy editing) and finding quick internet sources to verify some of the facts has proven tougher. Of course... I'd actually love to start getting into non-internet sourcing, but that isn't as readily available, so I haven't done it yet. To sum up... Beer is a large project that I'd prefer to work into later.

...on the other hand, Jack Daniel's has a lot of potential to become a good article and potentially a featured article, and for some reason I think I'd feel more comfortable starting there. It's more specific so it'd be easier to research, plus I'd imagine there is ample reliable sourcing for it. Of course, I'm just posting here to keep you informed, and advising that I'd likely need help from here to there so hopefully you won't mind watch listing that article. Thanks. Gwynand | TalkContribs 19:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah damn. I saw the section header in my watchlist and thought it was a party. Damn article writers...Keeper ǀ 76 19:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh good, was gonna cross post this to you Keeper. Already have a confusing issue with the article, if you have some time, mosy on over to the talk there and give an opinion. Gwynand | TalkContribs 19:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which one, beer or Jack? Keeper ǀ 76 19:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jack. Gwynand | TalkContribs 19:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heading there shortly. Need to find my cape and my form-fitting red and blue suit with the giant K on the chest...Keeper ǀ 76 20:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict on my own damn page!) Watchlisted, and having a look over the article now, G. Fritzpoll (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You get used to it (the edit conflicts, that is).  :-) Keeper ǀ 76 20:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Edit conflicts are for the popular. Nothing leads me to the conclusion that this was moe than a freak occurrence... Fritzpoll (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

G'Day Fritzpoll,

My previous paragraph has been archived. I am requesting rollback here, to help quickly revert vandalism... this is an example of vandalism where rollback would be acceptable (but as it was a single edit not necessary) and same here

Cheers,

--Carbon Rodney (Talk but be nice) 01:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done and made a comment on your talkpage Fritzpoll (talk) 10:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Fritzpoll. --Carbon Rodney (Talk but be nice) 13:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading

What time do you plan on beginning. Probably this evening when you get home? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 14:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite possible, but it looks like I'll be at work quite late tonight. I'll do my best to dig out the machine tonight and code up the additions I need to make to the bot, and worst comes to the worst, I'll upload sometime tomorrow morning. My deadlines always ahve a tendency to drift at the moment because of work - very hectic, this discovering new things Fritzpoll (talk) 14:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you would have been out enjoying the sun today, thats where I've been. My shoulders are burning a little from the sun. It was quite intense this afternoon. Probably the same in Bristol ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By and large I was! But did some editing while my dinner cooked Fritzpoll (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I made some templates for El Salvador at Wikipedia:WikiProject El Salvador/Department templates. El Salvador has to be one of the poorest covered countries on here. At least we now have the municipalities connected ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. I'm having to rewrite the bot quite a lot - really sorry. I'm feeling quite bad about the slipping deadline Fritzpoll (talk) 21:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PERM

No probs. :) Sorry about that, blame the software. :D At least we said the same thing! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, would have been awkward if we'd disagreed! Fritzpoll (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo

for you naerii 20:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]