User talk:DepartedUser4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cdogsimmons (talk | contribs) added comment |
Stay off my talk page and don't EVER accuse me of vandalism for enforcing policy |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarah_Palin&diff=prev&oldid=238996837 this comment] made me chuckle, though I think it may violate [[WP:BEANS]]... :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 16:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC) |
... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarah_Palin&diff=prev&oldid=238996837 this comment] made me chuckle, though I think it may violate [[WP:BEANS]]... :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 16:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
:He he thanks! When someone spends entire days editing just one talk page they either aren't as independent of the subject as they claim or they are using an alternate account. There's a difference between someone who simply cares about NPOV and someone campaigning on a talk page. It's hard to describe but when you've seen it enough times it becomes very obvious. More seriously, you guys are doing a great job keeping all this as NPOV as it can get. [[User:EconomicsGuy II|EconomicsGuy]] ([[User talk:EconomicsGuy II#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC) |
:He he thanks! When someone spends entire days editing just one talk page they either aren't as independent of the subject as they claim or they are using an alternate account. There's a difference between someone who simply cares about NPOV and someone campaigning on a talk page. It's hard to describe but when you've seen it enough times it becomes very obvious. More seriously, you guys are doing a great job keeping all this as NPOV as it can get. [[User:EconomicsGuy II|EconomicsGuy]] ([[User talk:EconomicsGuy II#top|talk]]) 04:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== [[Talk:Sarah Palin]] == |
|||
Please do not remove comments from talk pages as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarah_Palin&diff=prev&oldid=240150764 here]. Although I agree the page is not a forum, the information was relevant and obviously presented on the talk page as a way of discussing its inclusion in the article. Removing it was not warranted. Please don't remove relevant info in the future. It could be considered vandalism. Thanks.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 03:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:33, 22 September 2008
 | This is my only account. Others who claim to be me are imposters. |
 |
Consensus statement about Austrian economics on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Economics
Hi there,
Sorry to hear about your health problems. Best of luck dude!
I came by because I thought you would like to know that we are trying to hammer out a consensus statement about Austrian economics on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Economics. If you drop into wikipedia, please drop by and leave your comments if you can.
thanks, lk (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks, I'm getting better. I've posted a comment on the talk page. It seems that the debate was mostly about principle 2 which is already oiff the table anyway. Jimbo is not by any stretch an authoritive source on what is questionable science or not and I don't think we should use that definition. There are far, far worse examples of that than Austrian economics. What we should do is keep the coverage in seperate articles and then avoid the undue coverage issue by relying on the sources to determine to what extent Austrian views should be included. EconomicsGuy (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
... this comment made me chuckle, though I think it may violate WP:BEANS... :) MastCell Talk 16:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- He he thanks! When someone spends entire days editing just one talk page they either aren't as independent of the subject as they claim or they are using an alternate account. There's a difference between someone who simply cares about NPOV and someone campaigning on a talk page. It's hard to describe but when you've seen it enough times it becomes very obvious. More seriously, you guys are doing a great job keeping all this as NPOV as it can get. EconomicsGuy (talk) 04:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)