Jump to content

User talk:Netoholic: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gene Poole (talk | contribs)
wik's back
Bio infobox
Line 29: Line 29:
==Wik's back==
==Wik's back==
Thought you'd like to note that the above hard banned troll appears to have yet another new sockpuppet: [[User:Rivarez|Rivarez]]. Same old articles, same old trolling techniques. He's received 2 x 24hr bans in the last 3 days for breaking the 3RR against consensus at [[Sealand]]. I've already advised Jimbo. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 07:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Thought you'd like to note that the above hard banned troll appears to have yet another new sockpuppet: [[User:Rivarez|Rivarez]]. Same old articles, same old trolling techniques. He's received 2 x 24hr bans in the last 3 days for breaking the 3RR against consensus at [[Sealand]]. I've already advised Jimbo. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 07:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

==Bio infobox==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Vanbrugh&diff=24380150&oldid=24325585 That] was a triumph, getting a chance to refer to the unwiki no-no of page "ownership", wasn't it? Your own editing implies that you do think there '''are''' such things as page owners, actually: the creators of templates. You're too downy to say so, but your actions say it. Please note the number of people at [[WP:TfD]] who vote "Keep" for the bio infobox on the express condition that the "editors" of the page get to decide whether it's appropriate to use or not; it really doesn't look to me like the word "editors" in those votes refers to template warriors who have never edited the pages before--never mind who created the damn articles--who have never '''edited''' them. Btw, I don't know if you noticed I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion&diff=prev&oldid=23819553 reinserted your TfD vote], after you'd expressed on Fvw's talkpage how strongly you felt about it? Fvw didn't like it, but he wore it. Please don't think I mention it because I expect any return of graciousness from you, I'm done with that. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 09:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:12, 30 September 2005

Talk pages on other Wiki's - simple, meta

Add a new section


Motivation
"They are never alone that are accompanied with noble thoughts."
Sir Philip Sidney (1554 - 1586)
"To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
Elbert Hubbard (1856 - 1915)

Hi,

creating a transparent logo from a non-transparent one is a lot harder than just using the existing transparent one as a template. I would ask you to keep in place the Simple Logo I created, in order to maintain the distinction between the projects, until a better replacement can be found.-Eloquence* 19:21, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

Danny Wool has challenged us to get Wikijunior Solar System out to hurricane evacuees by October 32005. This is going to be tough!

You expressed interest in WikiJunior. Would you be willing now to join the push to get Wikijunior Solar System completed?

--SV Resolution(Talk) 16:02, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wik's back

Thought you'd like to note that the above hard banned troll appears to have yet another new sockpuppet: Rivarez. Same old articles, same old trolling techniques. He's received 2 x 24hr bans in the last 3 days for breaking the 3RR against consensus at Sealand. I've already advised Jimbo. --Gene_poole 07:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bio infobox

That was a triumph, getting a chance to refer to the unwiki no-no of page "ownership", wasn't it? Your own editing implies that you do think there are such things as page owners, actually: the creators of templates. You're too downy to say so, but your actions say it. Please note the number of people at WP:TfD who vote "Keep" for the bio infobox on the express condition that the "editors" of the page get to decide whether it's appropriate to use or not; it really doesn't look to me like the word "editors" in those votes refers to template warriors who have never edited the pages before--never mind who created the damn articles--who have never edited them. Btw, I don't know if you noticed I reinserted your TfD vote, after you'd expressed on Fvw's talkpage how strongly you felt about it? Fvw didn't like it, but he wore it. Please don't think I mention it because I expect any return of graciousness from you, I'm done with that. Bishonen | talk 09:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]