User talk:Non-dropframe: Difference between revisions
→Response: reply |
JenniferLK (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Thanks for asking, |
Thanks for asking, |
||
[[User:Non-dropframe|Non-dropframe]] ([[User talk:Non-dropframe#top|talk]]) 00:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Non-dropframe|Non-dropframe]] ([[User talk:Non-dropframe#top|talk]]) 00:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I also use Safari and Firefox and don't see any problem with the images, but I have turned them into a gallery instead, so perhpas you consider that better. An article of this length hardly needs any headings or subheadings yet. If it is expanded I could well see the point but not now. Cheers [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 01:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
:I also use Safari and Firefox and don't see any problem with the images, but I have turned them into a gallery instead, so perhpas you consider that better. An article of this length hardly needs any headings or subheadings yet. If it is expanded I could well see the point but not now. Cheers [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 01:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)<br /> |
||
'''Deletion of Sally's Krackers''' |
|||
I submitted an article by the name of Sally's Krackers and it was torn down due to the issue of notability. So I fixed it up, and then it got taken down for the same reason. But the wikipedia code says, "Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article on an artist or band that does not indicate that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia." I explained that Sally's Krackers is making significant contributions to the cultural undertones of the Prairies. Other artists on Wikipedia have far less about them, or explanation of significance, yet mine was speedily deleted. I have sources, quotes, the whole deal. I want to understand why it is that a group that is making significant waves is being deleted. |
|||
I'm contacting you because you have a message on my talkpage telling me to not upload stuff like Sally's Krackers. I am thoroughly confused considering it was artists like this, like the Carter Family or Jimmie Rogers who founded folk music as it exists today.[[User:JenniferLK|JenniferLK]] ([[User talk:JenniferLK|talk]]) 05:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)JenniferLK |
|||
Revision as of 05:20, 16 October 2008
| This is Non-dropframe's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Cleanup tag you left at Cut to shape
Do you have some particular suggestions by adding the cleanup tag to Cut to shape. For such a short article I don't see any need for this cleanup tag. Any constructive comments would be appreciated? ww2censor (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Response
I would suggest adding headings and subheadings. Also, the images are strangely formatted (at least in Safari and Firefox). Thanks for asking, Non-dropframe (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- I also use Safari and Firefox and don't see any problem with the images, but I have turned them into a gallery instead, so perhpas you consider that better. An article of this length hardly needs any headings or subheadings yet. If it is expanded I could well see the point but not now. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 01:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Sally's Krackers I submitted an article by the name of Sally's Krackers and it was torn down due to the issue of notability. So I fixed it up, and then it got taken down for the same reason. But the wikipedia code says, "Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article on an artist or band that does not indicate that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia." I explained that Sally's Krackers is making significant contributions to the cultural undertones of the Prairies. Other artists on Wikipedia have far less about them, or explanation of significance, yet mine was speedily deleted. I have sources, quotes, the whole deal. I want to understand why it is that a group that is making significant waves is being deleted. I'm contacting you because you have a message on my talkpage telling me to not upload stuff like Sally's Krackers. I am thoroughly confused considering it was artists like this, like the Carter Family or Jimmie Rogers who founded folk music as it exists today.JenniferLK (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)JenniferLK