Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Casliber: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Comments: new section
→‎Article work: new section
Line 6: Line 6:


'''[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]]''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
'''[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]]''' As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have '''support'''ed this candidate. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

== Article work ==

It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us have the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:03, 1 December 2008

Template:Acecandheader

Edit Analysis

A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Wikipedia spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article work

It is unfortunate that some editors appear to be opposing based on a concern that Casliber's excellent content contributions will diminish if he is elected. While that may be true (and I understand that concern), we all volunteers here, and each of us have the right to choose the areas in which we contribute. We should not seek to limit a volunteer's foray into a new area because of a prospective loss of that editor's contributions in another area. Kablammo (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]