Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop: Difference between revisions
Create |
Adding proposals |
||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
=Proposed final decision= |
=Proposed final decision= |
||
==Proposals by User: |
==Proposals by [[User:Elonka|Elonka]]== |
||
<!-- |
|||
===Proposed principles=== |
===Proposed principles=== |
||
====Template==== |
====Template==== |
||
| Line 120: | Line 121: | ||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
:'''Comment by others:''' |
||
:: |
:: |
||
--> |
|||
=== Proposed findings of fact === |
=== Proposed findings of fact === |
||
====PHG has not acknowledged the reasons for his original topic ban==== |
|||
====Template==== |
|||
1) {{user|PHG}} has still not acknowledged the legitimacy of the community's concerns that led to his original topic ban in the area of medieval and ancient history. |
|||
1) {text of proposed finding of fact} |
|||
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
||
| Line 131: | Line 132: | ||
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
||
:: Proposed, per PHG's statement.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/PHG#Statement_by_PHG] --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
:'''Comment by others:''' |
||
:: |
:: |
||
==== |
====Cleanup is still ongoing==== |
||
2) Extensive damage was caused to the project from PHG's previous biased editing in the topic area of medieval history, which resulted in strong bias being introduced into dozens of articles. After several months of work, cleanup efforts are still ongoing. ([[../Evidence#Cleanup_efforts_are_still_not_completed_from_the_last_case|evidence]]) |
|||
2) {text of proposed finding of fact} |
|||
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
||
| Line 143: | Line 144: | ||
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
||
:: Proposed. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: |
|||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
:'''Comment by others:''' |
||
| Line 149: | Line 150: | ||
===Proposed remedies=== |
===Proposed remedies=== |
||
<!-- |
|||
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small> |
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small> |
||
--> |
|||
====PHG's topic ban is extended indefinitely==== |
|||
====Template==== |
|||
1) The original [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Franco-Mongol_alliance#PHG_restricted|topic ban on editing articles related to medieval or ancient history]], which was set to expire in March 2009, is extended indefinitely. |
|||
1) {text of proposed remedy} |
|||
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
||
| Line 158: | Line 160: | ||
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
||
:: Proposed, due to the fact that cleanup is still ongoing, that PHG still does not acknowledge the things he did which led to the topic ban in the first place,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/PHG#Statement_by_PHG] and that PHG is still being combative on the talkpages of articles which are undergoing cleanup ([[../Evidence#PHG is continuing to engage in POV-pushing|evidence]]). The ban should remain in place to protect both PHG and the project, until PHG acknowledges the concerns that led to the ban, and agrees to adapt his future editing practices accordingly. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
|||
:: |
:: |
||
====PHG restricted==== |
|||
2) PHG is restricted from filing further ArbCom requests or motions on this matter, unless such requests have first received the approval of his mentor. |
|||
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:'''Comment by parties:''' |
|||
:: Proposed. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
:'''Comment by others:''' |
||
:: |
:: |
||
<!-- |
|||
====Template==== |
====Template==== |
||
3) {text of proposed remedy} |
|||
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' |
||
| Line 200: | Line 215: | ||
:'''Comment by others:''' |
:'''Comment by others:''' |
||
:: |
:: |
||
--> |
|||
==Proposals by User:Y== |
==Proposals by User:Y== |
||
Revision as of 17:06, 9 December 2008
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators and clerks may edit, for voting, clarification as well as implementation purposes.
Motions and requests by the parties
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed temporary injunctions
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
4)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Questions to the parties
Proposed final decision
Proposals by Elonka
Proposed findings of fact
PHG has not acknowledged the reasons for his original topic ban
1) PHG (talk · contribs) has still not acknowledged the legitimacy of the community's concerns that led to his original topic ban in the area of medieval and ancient history.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Proposed, per PHG's statement.[1] --Elonka 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment by others:
Cleanup is still ongoing
2) Extensive damage was caused to the project from PHG's previous biased editing in the topic area of medieval history, which resulted in strong bias being introduced into dozens of articles. After several months of work, cleanup efforts are still ongoing. (evidence)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Proposed. --Elonka 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
PHG's topic ban is extended indefinitely
1) The original topic ban on editing articles related to medieval or ancient history, which was set to expire in March 2009, is extended indefinitely.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Proposed, due to the fact that cleanup is still ongoing, that PHG still does not acknowledge the things he did which led to the topic ban in the first place,[2] and that PHG is still being combative on the talkpages of articles which are undergoing cleanup (evidence). The ban should remain in place to protect both PHG and the project, until PHG acknowledges the concerns that led to the ban, and agrees to adapt his future editing practices accordingly. --Elonka 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment by others:
PHG restricted
2) PHG is restricted from filing further ArbCom requests or motions on this matter, unless such requests have first received the approval of his mentor.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Proposed. --Elonka 17:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Y
Proposed principles
Template
1) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Z
Proposed principles
Template
1) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
General discussion
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others: