Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter William Wade: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:02, 14 January 2009

Peter William Wade

Despite the detailed article, I do not see anything that meets wp:bio. References (the ones that load to an actual site) do not assert notability either. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 02:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the article may be notable, at a stretch, it's poorly written. It's difficult to tell wether it is about Peter William Wade or his brother, or both! Probably better tagged for WP:CLEANUP. I'd help clean up this article but I have no interest in it whatsoever. Nick carson (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No, the same person created an article about Benjamin James Wade at the same time. I don't know what the occasion is, but neither one of them is having a birthday this month. In doing a Google news search, I can't see that either of them stands out, but since we're talking about only this person, here's the results for 2007 and 2008. [1]. If someone can show some notability please let me know. Mandsford

Comment: Since I actually took on the task of reading both Wade articles, I should share that it certainly seems like Benjamin is more notable.. he's on Survivor, conducts an Orchestra, College Coach.. not sure what that leads to, but I hope that explains why this is the only one I sent over. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 03:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sheesh. I thought Stephanie Sailor was the acme of vanity, but this takes the cake and eats it too. Seriously, descended of Pocahontas? The most traveled person in the US? And in between all these random and inflated facts, not a bit of substance. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Oh my gosh, this article should only be kept as an archive, to be shown as an example of how non-notable and vain a biography can get. --MrShamrock (talk) 06:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. But I must admit, there's something about that huge picture of those two dweebs that makes me chuckle. --MrShamrock (talk) 14:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity has no bounds. Racepacket (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Delete.''' Sheesh. I thought [[Stephanie Sailor]] was the acme of vanity, but this takes the cake and eats it too. Seriously, descended of Pocahontas? The most traveled person in the US? And in between all these random and inflated facts, not a bit of substance. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete.''' Oh my gosh, this article should only be kept as an archive, to be shown as an example of how non-notable and vain a biography can get.  --[[User:MrShamrock|MrShamrock]] ([[User talk:MrShamrock|talk]]) 06:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
+: Comment.  But I must admit, there's something about that huge picture of those two dweebs that makes me chuckle. --[[User:MrShamrock|MrShamrock]] ([[User talk:MrShamrock|talk]]) 14:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Vanity has no bounds. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 14:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)