Jump to content

User talk:Landed little marsdon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
notification
Line 14: Line 14:


[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Landed little marsdon]]. [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 15:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Landed little marsdon]]. [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 15:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience]] ==
As a motion amending the above-named Arbitration case, the [[WP:AC|Arbitration committee]] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to pseudoscience. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|editing restrictions]], described [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Martinphi-ScienceApologist#Discretionary sanctions|here]] and below.

*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently [[WP:AE]]), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Martinphi-ScienceApologist#Log_of_notifications|here]].[[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 18:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:01, 10 February 2009

mike nicol


Award for turning the other cheek

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
To reply as calmly to attacks as you did above is already uncommon; but to then defend your attacker when she is attacked is a sign of a truly magnanimous character.[1][2]Sebastian 07:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry accusation

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Landed little marsdon. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a motion amending the above-named Arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to pseudoscience. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

  • Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
  • The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
  • Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
  • Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.PhilKnight (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]