User talk:Fortynateyate

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Fortynateyate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What reason do you have to believe that I am a sock of "User:Rod Dreher"? I am not Wilerch, and since Wilerch was an obvious newbie around here I doubt he was the same as User:Rod Dreher either. You have no sufficient proof I am a sock either.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What reason do you have to believe that I am a sock of "User:Rod Dreher"? I am not Wilerch, and since Wilerch was an obvious newbie around here I doubt he was the same as User:Rod Dreher either. You have no sufficient proof I am a sock either. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=What reason do you have to believe that I am a sock of "User:Rod Dreher"? I am not Wilerch, and since Wilerch was an obvious newbie around here I doubt he was the same as User:Rod Dreher either. You have no sufficient proof I am a sock either. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=What reason do you have to believe that I am a sock of "User:Rod Dreher"? I am not Wilerch, and since Wilerch was an obvious newbie around here I doubt he was the same as User:Rod Dreher either. You have no sufficient proof I am a sock either. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• If you are unblocked, what constructive edits do you intend to make? Please reply below. —C.Fred (talk) 05:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• • I don't know yet, but I don't intend to suddenly leave the whole Rod Dreher thing alone until you show some respect to someone Wikipedia promoted the slander of. Going by the page-move last night on Talk:Rod Dreher, it's obvious people are still out to get him. Fortynateyate (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• • • WP:ANI#What shall we do about this editor?. Ongoing sock issue. seicer | talk | contribs 05:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) Yep. Vandalism happens. We clean it up as quickly as possible. You'll notice that the page is now protected against moves to prevent further malicious moves. Given that several eyes are on the Dreher article now (including mine: it's on my watchlist) so vandalism can be cleaned up readily by other users, what other ways would you contribute to Wikipedia? —C.Fred (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• Whatever I decide to contribute at the moment. Fortynateyate (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

No responses yet?? Fortynateyate (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

That's not a specific answer. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict)No, because you only gave us 10 minutes (we're volunteers and most of the active crowd are asleep now), and because you haven't really answered the question. What other ways would you contribute if unblocked? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

This editor was likely responsible for the BLP vio in the first place [1] confirming my original theory [2]. Don't even think about unblocking. 67.187.92.105 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)