User talk:Tkorrovi: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
dont violate policy, etc. |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
We have no agreement in almost anything Paul. I also wait you back tomorrow Paul (with no pleasure and certainly only with bad expectations). [[User:Tkorrovi|Tkorrovi]] 15 Mar 2004 |
We have no agreement in almost anything Paul. I also wait you back tomorrow Paul (with no pleasure and certainly only with bad expectations). [[User:Tkorrovi|Tkorrovi]] 15 Mar 2004 |
||
---- |
|||
Tkorrovi, you have violated many Wikipedia policies. First, one may not revert a page more than three times in a row. Second, one should listen to others' arguments. Third, one should review another's changes before blindly reverting them. Fourth, one should not flame and troll other users. I will now unprotect [[artificial consciousness]]. If you get into an edit war again, you will be banned. [[User:Ugen64|ugen64]] 23:05, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:05, 16 March 2004
Artificial Consciousness: I have added in a good para from Psb777. Possibly you should calm down a little. 203.221.246.35 21:11, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I included your change and didn't remove that. If you are Ataturk, then the problem was that to reverse Paul's changes (one of these removing almost all content) I had to make all changes in my copy and then put it up. Believe me, in such conditions it's feasible to include only very clear changes, the gentle changes of changing order of the text are not for such situation. I sincerely tried to do all my best to include your changes as completely as it ws possible, sorry if I failed to satisfy all you wanted. Please understand that this situation was not normal, if you see what this page was before Paul come -- people adding their changes without any dispute, why then coming of Paul changed all of that. tkorrovi
Where we were at the point I got involved was at this: work of art. I am attacked again and again but look how far we have come. Paul Beardsell 06:34, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
And this was also result of editing by several people. tkorrovi
You are fixated on who. Better to be fixated on what. Paul Beardsell 16:08, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
No, I fixate on reasons of dispute. tkorrovi
This is demonstrably not true. Whatever I do you revert. The same edit by someone else you allow.
I see you now fail to log in, something you are critical of others about. Paul Beardsell 16:57, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
> Whatever I do you revert.
This was only in the end when I couldn't cope with all your tricks any more in any possible way. All messages so far in talk bage signed with Tkorrovi (tkorrovi) were written by me.Tkorrovi 15 Mar 2004
OK, so you agree: Demonstrably not true. Paul Beardsell 18:49, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
We have no agreement in almost anything Paul. I also wait you back tomorrow Paul (with no pleasure and certainly only with bad expectations). Tkorrovi 15 Mar 2004
Tkorrovi, you have violated many Wikipedia policies. First, one may not revert a page more than three times in a row. Second, one should listen to others' arguments. Third, one should review another's changes before blindly reverting them. Fourth, one should not flame and troll other users. I will now unprotect artificial consciousness. If you get into an edit war again, you will be banned. ugen64 23:05, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)